Re: issue 38: Clarify the what kinds of extensibility elements go where

+1

Glen Daniels wrote:

> +1
>
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Sanjiva Weerawarana [mailto:sanjiva@watson.ibm.com]
> > Sent: Thursday, June 20, 2002 2:42 AM
> > To: WS-Desc WG (Public)
> > Subject: issue 38: Clarify the what kinds of extensibility elements go
> > where
> >
> >
> >
> > I would like to request that we close the following issue as
> > its redundant with another issue in the part1 spec (see below):
> >
> >   <issue>
> >     <issue-num>38</issue-num>
> >     <title>Clarify the what kinds of extensibility elements go
> > where.</title>
> >     <locus>Spec</locus>
> >     <requirement>n/a</requirement>
> >     <priority>Editorial</priority>
> >     <topic></topic>
> >     <status>Active</status>
> >     <originator><a href="mailto:sanjiva@watson.ibm.com">Sanjiva
> > Weerawarana</a></originator>
> >     <responsible>Unassigned</responsible>
> >     <description>
> >     [<a
> > href="http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Member/w3c-ws-desc/2002Apr/
> > 0029.html">ema
> > il</a>]
> >     There is confusion in the user community about what should go in a
> > binding
> >     vs. a port vs. a service in terms of extensibility.
> >     An approach could be to that data marshalling type
> > extensions go in
> >     a binding and transport stuff goes in to a port and anything else
> >     goes into a service.
> >     </description>
> >     <proposal>
> >     </proposal>
> >     <resolution>
> >     </resolution>
> >   </issue>
> >
> > The issue in the part1 spec is:
> >
> > <issue id="issue-clarify-elements">
> >   <head>Clarify the what kinds of extensibility elements go
> > where.</head>
> >   There is confusion in the user community about what should go in a
> >   binding vs. a port vs. a service in terms of extensibility. An
> >   approach could be to that data marshalling type extensions go in
> >   a binding and transport stuff goes in to a port and anything else
> >   goes into a service.
> >   <source>Sanjiva Weerawarana</source>
> > </issue>
> >
> > Sanjiva.
> >

Received on Thursday, 20 June 2002 11:10:18 UTC