- From: Jean-Jacques Moreau <moreau@crf.canon.fr>
- Date: Fri, 14 Jun 2002 12:01:41 +0200
- To: Jochen.Ruetschlin@DaimlerChrysler.com
- CC: joyce.yang@oracle.com, www-ws-desc@w3.org
I don't think the point is about the least common denominator, but about not tying a particular Web Service to a given implementation. Allow operation overloading would, IMO, just do that. Jean-Jacques. Jochen.Ruetschlin@DaimlerChrysler.com wrote: > As stated in 2.1 of our charter (http://www.w3.org/2002/01/ws-desc-charter#prog > ) the WSDL framework "is not geared towards any programming language". The > other way round this could mean, that we should not exclude useful features > only because some --- let me be more restrective and say: "exotic" in the sense > of not used in a broad way --- programming languages does not allow function > overloading.
Received on Friday, 14 June 2002 06:02:52 UTC