- From: Jean-Jacques Moreau <moreau@crf.canon.fr>
- Date: Wed, 05 Jun 2002 14:47:53 +0200
- To: Prasad Yendluri <pyendluri@webmethods.com>
- CC: Web Service Description <www-ws-desc@w3.org>
Prasad, I am confused. There is no section 5.11, AFAIK. Is it section 5.1, WSDL 1.1 [1]? (and not the editor copy at [2]?) Raised as new issue #60 anyway. Jean-Jacques. [1] http://www.w3.org/TR/2001/NOTE-wsdl-20010315 [2] http://dev.w3.org/cvsweb/~checkout~/2002/ws/desc/part2/wsdl12-part2.html Prasad Yendluri wrote: > Action Item for me from last meeting: > > >2002.05.30: Prasad to raise an issue of spec inconsistency > about optional parts. > > The examples in Section 5.11 clearly see the need for parts > being optional. However since decided that parts in messages > will not be permitted to be optional, we need to fix the > examples. Example 7 carries in its description: > > The response contains multiple parts encoded in the MIME format > multipart/related: a SOAP Envelope containing the current stock > price as a float, zero or more marketing literature documents > in HTML format, and an optional company logo in either GIF or > JPEG format. > > However, neither the abstract level definitions nor the > concrete bindings shown make the parts (attachments) optional. > Specifically the "optional" company-logo nor the marking > literature (zero or more => optional w/ cardinality) are really > not optional. We need to fix the examples accordingly. > > Regards, Prasad
Received on Wednesday, 5 June 2002 08:49:07 UTC