- From: Sanjiva Weerawarana <sanjiva@watson.ibm.com>
- Date: Thu, 11 Jul 2002 21:34:02 +0600
- To: "Martin Gudgin" <mgudgin@microsoft.com>, <www-ws-desc@w3.org>
"Martin Gudgin" <mgudgin@microsoft.com> writes: > > I've been updated the schema for our spec[1] and have run into trouble > describing out completely open content model. I think we agreed in Paris > that EIIs from other namespaces could appear absolutely anywhere. > Unfortunately due to the optional nature of, for example, the import and > type EIIs this makes the content model for, in this example, > definitions, non-deterministic. The operation EIIs inside bindings have > a similar problem. Ouch, non-determinism is bad. > If we make things only extensible at the end ( or at the beginning ), > this problem will go away. For definitions we could allow extension > elements at any point AFTER import and type... +1. For consistency sake, should we say that extension elements must always appear *after* any WSDL 1.2 elements? Sanjiva.
Received on Thursday, 11 July 2002 11:35:02 UTC