- From: Jacek Kopecky <jacek@systinet.com>
- Date: Fri, 5 Jul 2002 01:31:46 +0200 (CEST)
- To: Martin Gudgin <mgudgin@microsoft.com>
- cc: www-ws-desc@w3.org
+1. 8-)
Jacek Kopecky
Senior Architect, Systinet Corporation
http://www.systinet.com/
On Tue, 25 Jun 2002, Martin Gudgin wrote:
>
> According to WSDL 1.1 the value of the name attribute of all port
> elements in a WSDL document must be unique. Effectively, ports have
> their own symbol space, along with messages, portTypes, bindings and
> services. However, ports do NOT take on the target namespace of the WSDL
> document, so it is impossible to refer to them from elsewhere ( e.g.
> from another WSDL document ). For consistency, it would make sense to
> say that the names of ports need only be unique within the service they
> are contained by.
>
> Changes to spec:
>
> In section 3.8 change:
>
> The name attribute provides a unique name among all ports defined within
> in the enclosing WSDL document
>
> To
>
> The name attribute provides a unique name among all ports defined within
> a given service element
>
>
>
> Changes to schema:
>
> remove uniqueness constraint on wsdl:service/wsdl:port from definitions
> global element declaration
> Add uniqueness constraint for wsdl:port to service local element
> declaration
>
>
> Gudge
>
Received on Thursday, 4 July 2002 19:31:50 UTC