RE: service name as local part of a qname from Jeffrey Schlimmer on 2002-07-04 (www-ws-desc@w3.org from July 2002)

From: Jeffrey Schlimmer <jeffsch@windows.microsoft.com>
Date: Wed, 3 Jul 2002 19:16:19 -0700
To: <www-ws-desc@w3.org>
Cc: "Jonathan Marsh" <jmarsh@microsoft.com>
Message-ID: <2E33960095B58E40A4D3345AB9F65EC107D67012@win-msg-01.wingroup.windeploy.ntdev.mi>

Sanjiva Weerawarana [mailto:sanjiva@watson.ibm.com] wrote:
>Note that the "it must not be referenceable as a QName" restriction
>does NOT go away with this change. In fact, it becomes even more
>critical.
>
>To be able to refer to directly point to a port via a QName, one 
>would have to require portNames to be unique across the entire
>namespace. IMO that's the wrong direction ..

I agree. (It appears I flipped a bit in my text.) 

>So does that mean I can update the part1 doc too and close the
>issue? When was this changed in the schema??

I believe Martin added this during a conference call; let's double check
at the next teleconference.

--Jeff

Received on Wednesday, 3 July 2002 22:16:49 UTC