- From: Jean-Jacques Moreau <moreau@crf.canon.fr>
- Date: Tue, 02 Jul 2002 18:10:19 +0200
- To: Naresh Agarwal <nagarwal@in.firstrain.com>
- CC: www-ws-desc@w3.org
Hi Naresh, Please see below my answers to your questions. I would also like to point out that this WG will be looking at supporting SOAP 1.2. Since SOAP 1.2 has a built-in framework for (easily) supporting other protocols, we will likely propagate some of these capabilities into WSDL 1.2, so that your job may become somewhat easier in the future. Jean-Jacques. Naresh Agarwal wrote: > Hi > WSDL 1.1 includes a binding for SOAP 1.1 endpoints. It specifies the binding, if SOAP is used along with HTTP. > If i wish to use SOAP over FTP, then i need to make certain changes in SOAP bindings of WSDL. > I have listed these changes below- > > 1) "tranport" attribute of <definitions>\<bindings>\<soap:bindings> element need to be changes. It is an URI. Can i use any unique string for this, or i need to get a standard URI from a body like IANA? Pick your own, stable URI. Register it if you feel like it and you think there is a lot of interest for your binding. Make others are aware of it and use the same URI. > 2)"soapAction" <definitions>\<bindings>\<operation>\<soap:operation> will no more be used. soapAction is optional, so no problem here. > 3) "location" attribute <definitions>\<service>\<port>\<soap:address> would be a FTP URL Yes, anyURI can go here. > Am i missing something? Do i need to make any other changes in the WSDL bindings? > What is the procedure to get *such* new bindings standardized? Probably the first step is to gather enough interest. Asking here like you've just done is perfectly fit. > Any help would be greatly appreciated! > thanks, > regards, > Naresh Agarwal
Received on Tuesday, 2 July 2002 12:11:13 UTC