- From: Prasad Yendluri <pyendluri@webmethods.com>
- Date: Tue, 10 Dec 2002 10:36:33 -0800
- To: Jonathan Marsh <jmarsh@microsoft.com>
- CC: www-ws-desc@w3.org
- Message-ID: <3DF63431.1060502@webmethods.com>
Hi, >4) State that the HTTP binding simply does not support output >operations. Arthur has an action to investigate what it would mean to >support output ops in the HTTP binding, which may lead to a proposal or >issues, or both. > Are we specifically referring to the "HTTP GET/POST binding" here or to the SOAP/HTTP binding as well? I take it is the former. I do not particularly see an issue with the SOAP/HTTP binding for output operations. As we discussed in the last week's WG call, only the actual end-point information (where the output operations get transmitted to) needs to be obtained via out-of-band means ; but all other SOAP/HTTP binding aspects are equally applicable to input and output operations.. Regards, Prasad -------- Original Message -------- Subject: Outboud ops state of debate Resent-Date: Tue, 10 Dec 2002 12:42:57 -0500 (EST) Resent-From: www-ws-desc@w3.org Date: Tue, 10 Dec 2002 09:42:23 -0800 From: "Jonathan Marsh" <jmarsh@microsoft.com> To: <www-ws-desc@w3.org> I promised to send a statement of the proposal that emerged on output ops at the last telcon. The proposal is: 1) Keep output operations in the spec. 2) Publish the TCP binding as a note motivating the need to retain output operations. 3) Add a non-normative reference to this note from the spec. 4) State that the HTTP binding simply does not support output operations. Arthur has an action to investigate what it would mean to support output ops in the HTTP binding, which may lead to a proposal or issues, or both. > >
Received on Tuesday, 10 December 2002 13:35:30 UTC