- From: David Orchard <dorchard@bea.com>
- Date: Fri, 6 Dec 2002 15:51:04 -0800
- To: "'Champion, Mike'" <Mike.Champion@SoftwareAG-USA.com>, <www-ws-desc@w3.org>
So any chance of you telling us what the right thing is for a whole bunch of areas? Maybe the Saniva W "WS-Doctrine" or the "SWWS-Arch" or "WS according to Sanjiva"? If WSD goes against what you want, just punt it to ws-arch and then it could just do what you want? That would save us all a whack of time :-) Cheers, Dave > -----Original Message----- > From: www-ws-desc-request@w3.org [mailto:www-ws-desc-request@w3.org]On > Behalf Of Sanjiva Weerawarana > Sent: Friday, December 06, 2002 12:02 PM > To: David Orchard; 'Champion, Mike'; www-ws-desc@w3.org > Subject: Re: "Web service" or "web service" > > > > Iff it does the (== my) right thing, of course. > > ;-) > > Sanjiva. > > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "David Orchard" <dorchard@bea.com> > To: "'Sanjiva Weerawarana'" <sanjiva@watson.ibm.com>; > "'Champion, Mike'" > <Mike.Champion@SoftwareAG-USA.com>; <www-ws-desc@w3.org> > Sent: Friday, December 06, 2002 1:23 PM > Subject: RE: "Web service" or "web service" > > > > > > So Sanjiva, if wsd had thought that Web service was right, > and ws-arch > > thought that Web Service was right, would ws-arch still have the > authority? > > :-) > > > > Is the ws-arch authority only if it does the right thing ;-) > > > > he he > > > > Dave > > > > > -----Original Message----- > > > From: www-ws-desc-request@w3.org > [mailto:www-ws-desc-request@w3.org]On > > > Behalf Of Sanjiva Weerawarana > > > Sent: Friday, December 06, 2002 5:51 AM > > > To: Champion, Mike; www-ws-desc@w3.org > > > Subject: Re: "Web service" or "web service" > > > > > > > > > > > > Yes yes yes please do override the WS-Desc decision .. we have > > > given you guys the authority do so per the last telecon!! > > > > > > "Web Service" is wrong. "Web service" is right. Of course. > > > > > > ;-) > > > > > > Sanjiva. > > > > > > ----- Original Message ----- > > > From: "Champion, Mike" <Mike.Champion@SoftwareAG-USA.com> > > > To: <www-ws-desc@w3.org> > > > Sent: Friday, December 06, 2002 8:31 AM > > > Subject: RE: "Web service" or "web service" > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -----Original Message----- > > > > > From: Martin Gudgin [mailto:mgudgin@microsoft.com] > > > > > Sent: Thursday, December 05, 2002 3:43 PM > > > > > To: Sanjiva Weerawarana; Mark Baker; www-ws-desc@w3.org > > > > > Subject: RE: "Web service" or "web service" > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > It was decided on the call to go for "Web Service". From > > > the IRC log: > > > > > > > > > > > > The WSA WG did a straw poll on our telcon yesterday and > > > there was a 2:1 > > > > majority for "Web service." Although obviously no one > > > wants to "lay down > > > in > > > > the road" on such a non-critical issue, two fairly strong > > > reasons emerged > > > in > > > > the discussion: > > > > > > > > - In terms of grammar, "Web" should be capitalized because > > > it is a proper > > > > noun, i.e., it refers to the World Wide Web, and "service" > > > is not. (I > > > guess > > > > one could argue that "Web Service" is a compound proper > > > noun, like United > > > > States or whatever). > > > > > > > > - In sheer pragmatic terms, at least two member > companies (rather > > > > substantial ones, to say the least) noted that they had > standardized > > > > internally on "Web service" and that there was a LOT of > > > documentation, > > > > marketing material, etc. that would in principle have to be > > > revised at > > > > substantial cost to be consistent with a different convention. > > > > > > > > Very deep sigh :-) > > > > > > > >
Received on Friday, 6 December 2002 21:41:25 UTC