Fw: definition of web services in "web services architecture"

Hmm. Do we adopt the perspective that Mike is referring to below?
If so it seems to me that we'd have to make the R120 proposal from
Arthur into a normative one .. contrary to what we plan on doing
now as I recall.

Bye,

Sanjiva.

----- Original Message -----
From: "Champion, Mike" <Mike.Champion@SoftwareAG-USA.com>
To: "Joao Paulo Andrade Almeida" <almeida@cs.utwente.nl>;
<www-ws-arch@w3.org>
Sent: Friday, November 29, 2002 10:29 AM
Subject: RE: definition of web services in "web services architecture"


>
>
>
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Joao Paulo Andrade Almeida [mailto:almeida@cs.utwente.nl]
> > Sent: Friday, November 29, 2002 9:25 AM
> > To: www-ws-arch@w3.org
> > Subject: definition of web services in "web services architecture"
> >
> >
> >
> > Services described in WSDL 1.1 are not identified by a URI.
> > Instead, each port of a service is identified by a URI.
> >
> > Is this intentional? Have I interpreted the definition
> > correctly?
>
> I can't speak for the working group's intention vis a vis WSDL 1.1.
> Nevertheless, the general purpose of the definition is to look forward to
a
> "reference architecture" incorporating WSDL 1.2 than to be backward
> compatible with everything we now think of as a "web service".  This does
> not mean that WSDL 1.1 can't be used to describe "web services", just that
> it is best practice to use URIs whenever feasible to identify web service
> components so as to maximize compatibility and interoperability with the
> rest of the Web.  WSDL 1.2 adopts this perspective.
>
> In light of this, could you suggest some specific clarifications in the
> text?

Received on Sunday, 1 December 2002 08:14:19 UTC