www-ws-desc@w3.org from April 2002 by date

Tuesday, 30 April 2002

• Extending port types (AKA a scenario for UPnP) Jeffrey Schlimmer
• W3C WSDL WG: 6b. Define encoding for non-ASCII characters in request URL Jeffrey Schlimmer
• Regrets for May 2 telecon Sadiq, Waqar
• RE: Issue: Should Operations permit alternate and multiple responses Dale Moberg
• OASIS ebXML-CPPA specification 1.9 Initial Public Review. Dale Moberg
• import / include issue Sanjiva Weerawarana

Monday, 29 April 2002

• updated part1 docs (editor's drafts) Sanjiva Weerawarana
• Re: Draft minutes of 2002/04/25 telcon Sanjiva Weerawarana
• Re: Issue: Should Operations permit alternate and multiple responses Sanjiva Weerawarana
• Re: Issue: Support for optionality of parts in Messages Prasad Yendluri
• Re: Issue: Why should not there be a relationship among ports in a Service? Sanjiva Weerawarana
• Re: Issue: Should Operations permit alternate and multiple responses Prasad Yendluri
• Re: Issue: Should Operations permit alternate and multiple responses Sanjiva Weerawarana
• Re: Issue: Support for optionality of parts in Messages Sanjiva Weerawarana
• Re: Draft minutes of 2002/04/25 telcon Sanjiva Weerawarana
• Ann: Web Service Description Requirements published Jonathan Marsh
• URI Escaping and IRIs (was Issues 6a, 6d, 41. Define encoding into a request URL) Jonathan Marsh
• Regrets for 2 May and 9 May teleconferences Swearingen Sandra Civ AFCA/ITCM
• RE: Draft minutes of 2002/04/25 telcon Sedukhin, Igor
• Draft minutes of 2002/04/25 telcon Jacek Kopecky
• Re: W3C WSDL WG Issues: Non-SOAP HTTP Binding Jean-Jacques Moreau

Sunday, 28 April 2002

• Re: Conflicts of WSDL schemas Sanjiva Weerawarana

Saturday, 27 April 2002

• Issues 6a, 6d, 41. Define encoding into a request URL Jeffrey Schlimmer
• W3C WSDL WG Issues: Non-SOAP HTTP Binding Jeffrey Schlimmer

Friday, 26 April 2002

• XLANG, WSFL response on solicit-response and output-only Jonathan Marsh
• RE: Open Content Model Jonathan Marsh
• Re: Issue: Why should not there be a relationship among ports in a Service? Prasad Yendluri
• Re: Issue: Support for optionality of parts in Messages Prasad Yendluri
• Re: Conflicts of WSDL schemas Francisco Curbera
• Conflicts of WSDL schemas Liu, Kevin
• RE: Issue: Should Operations permit alternate and multiple responses Dale Moberg
• Re: Open Content Model Christopher Ferris
• RE: Open Content Model Glen Daniels
• Re: Open Content Model Simon Horrell
• Re: Open Content Model Christopher Ferris
• RE: Open Content Model Matt Long
• RE: Open Content Model Glen Daniels
• Re: Issue: MIME Binding permits 0 parts in multipart/related Jean-Jacques Moreau
• Re: Issue: Permit "message" attribute in mime:content binding Jean-Jacques Moreau
• Re: Issue: Should Operations permit alternate and multiple responses Sanjiva Weerawarana
• Re: Issue: Why should not there be a relationship among ports in a Service? Sanjiva Weerawarana
• Re: Issue: Should Operations permit alternate and multiple responses Jean-Jacques Moreau
• Re: Issue: Support for optionality of parts in Messages Jean-Jacques Moreau
• Re: Open Content Model Sanjiva Weerawarana
• Re: FW: Open Content Model Jean-Jacques Moreau
• Re: HTTP Binding Issues Jean-Jacques Moreau

Thursday, 25 April 2002

• Re: multipe protocols/bindings that implements serviceType [Re: slides from my presentation on issues with the core spec] Aleksander Slominski
• Re: multipe protocols/bindings that implements serviceType [Re: slides from my presentation on issues with the core spec] Steve Graham
• FW: Open Content Model Glen Daniels
• Late regrets Sadiq, Waqar
• Re: Agenda for 2002-04-25 WS Description WG Philippe Le Hegaret
• Re: multipe protocols/bindings that implements serviceType [Re: slides from my presentation on issues with the core spec] Sanjiva Weerawarana
• multipe protocols/bindings that implements serviceType [Re: slides from my presentation on issues with the core spec] Aleksander Slominski
• Re: Open Content Model Sanjiva Weerawarana
• RE: Open Content Model Jeffrey Schlimmer

Wednesday, 24 April 2002

• RE: Open Content Model Jonathan Marsh
• Re: Open Content Model Sanjiva Weerawarana
• RE: issue: support cross references within a WSDL file using ncnames? Jonathan Marsh
• RE: Web Services Description Conference call minutes for April 18 , 20 02 Malu, Pallavi G
• RE: Open Content Model David Cleary
• Write up question for XLANG and/or WSFL groups whether they need solicit-response. Prasad Yendluri
• Re: Web Services Description Conference call minutes for April 18, 20 02 Prasad Yendluri
• Agenda for 2002-04-25 WS Description WG Jonathan Marsh
• RE: issue: support cross references within a WSDL file using ncnames? Keith Ballinger
• W3C Web Service Description WG: Requirements Jeffrey Schlimmer
• RE: issue: support cross references within a WSDL file using ncnames? Anne Thomas Manes
• Re: Web Services Description Conference call minutes for April 18 , 20 02 Sanjiva Weerawarana
• Re: issue: support cross references within a WSDL file using ncnames? Sanjiva Weerawarana
• Re: issue: remove solicit-response and output-only operations? Sanjiva Weerawarana
• Re: issue: remove solicit-response and output-only operations? Sanjiva Weerawarana

Tuesday, 23 April 2002

• RE: New wording for R001 Jeffrey Schlimmer
• RE: Open Content Model Jonathan Marsh
• Open Content Model Keith Ballinger

Monday, 22 April 2002

• RE: HTTP Binding Issues Jonathan Marsh
• RE: IRC Jonathan Marsh
• IRC Stumbo, William K
• RE: minutes from April 18 Sedukhin, Igor
• RE: minutes from April 18 Jonathan Marsh
• Use cases Sadiq, Waqar
• RE: minutes from April 18 Tom Jordahl
• Usecase document Sadiq, Waqar

Saturday, 20 April 2002

• RE: Candidate use cases for removal from Use Case document Sadiq, Waqar
• HTTP Binding Issues Paul Prescod
• Re: issue: remove solicit-response and output-only operations? Prasad Yendluri
• Re: Web Services Description Conference call minutes for April 18 , 20 02 Prasad Yendluri

Friday, 19 April 2002

• RE: Web Services Description Conference call minutes for April 18 , 20 02 Sedukhin, Igor
• RE: Candidate use cases for removal from Use Case document Sedukhin, Igor
• Re: issue: remove solicit-response and output-only operations? Roberto Chinnici
• Candidate use cases for removal from Use Case document Sadiq, Waqar
• Re: Web Services Description WG April 2002 F2F Minutes Paul Prescod
• RE: Web Services Description WG April 2002 F2F Minutes Jonathan Marsh
• Re: Web Services Description WG April 2002 F2F Minutes Paul Prescod

Thursday, 18 April 2002

• Re: New wording for R001 David Booth
• Web Services Description Working Group 2002-04-04 (real!) meeting minutes Jonathan Marsh
• Web Services Description Working Group 2002-03-28 meeting minutes (was -04-04 minutes) Jonathan Marsh
• Web Services Description WG April 2002 F2F Minutes Jonathan Marsh
• introduction michael.mahan@nokia.com
• RE: issue: remove solicit-response and output-only operations? Malu, Pallavi G
• Web Services Description Conference call minutes for April 18, 20 02 Tom Jordahl
• Re: New wording for R001 Jacek Kopecky
• New wording for R001 David Booth

Wednesday, 17 April 2002

• Slightly cleaned up Requirements Document 20020417 Jonathan Marsh
• Re: issue: support cross references within a WSDL file using ncnames? Roberto Chinnici
• RE: issue: remove solicit-response and output-only operations? Malu, Pallavi G
• Re: issue: support cross references within a WSDL file using ncnames? Martin Gudgin
• Re: issue: support cross references within a WSDL file using ncnames? Martin Gudgin
• Re: issue: support cross references within a WSDL file using ncnames? Martin Gudgin
• Re: issue: support cross references within a WSDL file using ncnames? Martin Gudgin
• Re: issue: support cross references within a WSDL file using ncnames? Martin Gudgin
• Re: issue: support cross references within a WSDL file using ncnames? Martin Gudgin
• Re: issue: remove solicit-response and output-only operations? Roberto Chinnici

Tuesday, 16 April 2002

• Re: issue: remove solicit-response and output-only operations? Christopher Ferris
• Re: issue: remove solicit-response and output-only operations? Prasad Yendluri
• RE: issue: support cross references within a WSDL file using ncnames? Jonathan Marsh
• RE: issue: remove solicit-response and output-only operations? Sandeep Kumar
• Re: issue: remove solicit-response and output-only operations? Prasad Yendluri
• Re: issue: support cross references within a WSDL file using ncnames? Francisco Curbera
• Re: issue: remove solicit-response and output-only operations? Roberto Chinnici
• Re: issue: support cross references within a WSDL file using ncnames? Martin Gudgin
• Re: Suggested integration requirement Mark Baker
• Re: Suggested integration requirement Sanjiva Weerawarana
• Issue: Permit "message" attribute in mime:content binding Prasad Yendluri
• Issue: MIME Binding permits 0 parts in multipart/related Prasad Yendluri
• Issue: Why should not there be a relationship among ports in a Service? Prasad Yendluri
• Issue: Should Operations permit alternate and multiple responses Prasad Yendluri
• Issue: Support for optionality of parts in Messages Prasad Yendluri
• Re: issue: remove solicit-response and output-only operations? Prasad Yendluri
• Re: Clarification on proposed requirement Uche Ogbuji
• Re: issue: support cross references within a WSDL file using ncnames? Simon Fell
• RE: issue: remove solicit-response and output-only operations? Malu, Pallavi G

Monday, 15 April 2002

• Suggested integration requirement Mark Baker
• Re: Clarification on proposed requirement Eric Prud'hommeaux
• Re: Clarification on proposed requirement Uche Ogbuji
• Re: Clarification on proposed requirement Uche Ogbuji
• Re: Clarification on proposed requirement Eric Prud'hommeaux
• Re: Clarification on proposed requirement Uche Ogbuji
• Re: issue: support cross references within a WSDL file using ncnames? Sanjiva Weerawarana
• Re: issue: support cross references within a WSDL file using ncnames? Simon Fell
• Re: issue: support cross references within a WSDL file using ncnames? Sanjiva Weerawarana

Friday, 12 April 2002

• Use Case: Storage and Retrieval of WSDL in Registries and Repositories ryman@ca.ibm.com

Sunday, 14 April 2002

• Re: issue: support cross references within a WSDL file using ncnames? Sanjiva Weerawarana

Saturday, 13 April 2002

• Re: issue: support cross references within a WSDL file using ncnames? Bob Cunnings
• Re: issue: support cross references within a WSDL file using ncnames? Simon Fell
• issue: support cross references within a WSDL file using ncnames? Sanjiva Weerawarana
• issue: remove solicit-response and output-only operations? Sanjiva Weerawarana
• current editors' draft of the WSDL 1.2 core spec Sanjiva Weerawarana
• slides from my presentation on issues with the core spec Sanjiva Weerawarana

Friday, 12 April 2002

• Draft Requirements doc reflecting FTF decisions. Jonathan Marsh
• Clarification on proposed requirement David Booth
• Re: slides for WSDl, NE Philippe Le Hegaret
• slides for interop issues talk Keith Ballinger
• slides for WSDl, NE Keith Ballinger
• Re: Collecting issues against WSDL 1.1 Jean-Jacques Moreau

Wednesday, 10 April 2002

• Re: Collecting issues against WSDL 1.1 ryman@ca.ibm.com

Friday, 12 April 2002

• Snapshot of Requirements draft after Apr 11th decisions Jonathan Marsh

Thursday, 11 April 2002

• Re: Requirements 4.1 General draft disposition Martin Gudgin

Wednesday, 10 April 2002

• RE: Requirements 4.11 Security Dale Moberg
• Requirements 4.1 General draft disposition Martin Gudgin
• F2F Sadiq, Waqar
• RE: Orchestration (was: W3C Web Service Description WG: Require ments) Sadiq, Waqar

Tuesday, 9 April 2002

• Re: Orchestration (was: W3C Web Service Description WG: Require ments) Sanjiva Weerawarana
• Draft Requirements Section 4.5 recommendations Stumbo, William K
• Web Services Description Working Group 2002-04-04 meeting minutes Jonathan Marsh
• RE: Initial impression about requirements placed by WSCL on WSDL Malu, Pallavi G
• Initial impression about requirements placed by WSCL on WSDL Sadiq, Waqar
• Revised Agenda April 10-12 Face-to-face meeting. Jonathan Marsh
• Requirements 4.12 and 5 draft disposition Jonathan Marsh
• [Fwd: Collecting issues against WSDL 1.1] Jean-Jacques Moreau
• Re: Collecting issues against WSDL 1.1 Jean-Jacques Moreau
• Re: Collecting issues against WSDL 1.1 Jean-Jacques Moreau

Monday, 8 April 2002

• RE: Orchestration (was: W3C Web Service Description WG: Require ments) VAMBENEPE,WILLIAM (HP-Cupertino,ex1)
• RE: Orchestration (was: W3C Web Service Description WG: Require ments) Sadiq, Waqar
• RE: Orchestration (was: W3C Web Service Description WG: Requirements) Jonathan Marsh

Friday, 5 April 2002

• RE: W3C Web Service Description WG: Requirements VAMBENEPE,WILLIAM (HP-Cupertino,ex1)
• RE: R067 and R967a: extensibility Sedukhin, Igor
• W3C Web Service Description WG: Requirements Jeffrey Schlimmer
• RE: R067 and R967a: extensibility Jeffrey Schlimmer
• RE: W3C Web Service Description WG: Requirements Jeffrey Schlimmer
• RE: W3C Web Service Description WG: Requirements Sedukhin, Igor
• Re: Collecting issues against WSDL 1.1 Jean-Jacques Moreau
• Re: Collecting issues against WSDL 1.1 Jean-Jacques Moreau
• Re: Collecting issues against WSDL 1.1 Herve Ruellan
• RE: W3C Web Service Description WG: Requirements Jeffrey Schlimmer

Thursday, 4 April 2002

• RE: W3C Web Service Description WG: Requirements Sedukhin, Igor
• R067 and R967a: extensibility Sedukhin, Igor
• Re: Collecting issues against WSDL 1.1 Jacek Kopecky
• DR028: describe SOAP 1.2 messages Jean-Jacques Moreau
• Re: Collecting issues against WSDL 1.1 Jean-Jacques Moreau
• Re: Collecting issues against WSDL 1.1 Jean-Jacques Moreau
• Re: Collecting issues against WSDL 1.1 Jean-Jacques Moreau
• Re: [rdfws] Re: RDF mapping for WSDL Uche Ogbuji

Wednesday, 3 April 2002

• W3C Web Service Description WG: Requirements Jeffrey Schlimmer
• R060: Description of message exchanges and protocol binding Hugo Haas
• RE: Collecting issues against WSDL 1.1 David E. Cleary
• RE: Higher-level support for SOAP extensions/modules Jeffrey Schlimmer
• Re: Should a Service Implement a Single PortType? Roberto Chinnici
• Re: Collecting issues against WSDL 1.1 Jean-Jacques Moreau
• Re: Collecting issues against WSDL 1.1 Bob Cunnings
• Collecting issues against WSDL 1.1 Jean-Jacques Moreau

Tuesday, 2 April 2002

• Re: Should a Service Implement a Single PortType? ryman@ca.ibm.com
• Re: Should a Service Implement a Single PortType? Roberto Chinnici
• Re: Should a Service Implement a Single PortType? Jacek Kopecky
• Re: alternative format for WSDL that is SOAP compatible Jean-Jacques Moreau
• Re: alternative format for WSDL that is SOAP compatible Jean-Jacques Moreau

Monday, 1 April 2002

• RE: WS Description Status Report 1 April 2002 Jonathan Marsh
• WS Description Status Report 1 April 2002 Jonathan Marsh

Last message date: Tuesday, 30 April 2002 19:34:20 UTC