MTOM description discussion

Summary of the state of the WSDL WG from this morning's call [1]:

 

No firm consensus yet on whether this WG would develop MTOM descriptive
capabilities (policy assertion, extension, or both) if the XMLP WG declines
to accept this topic.  There is so far a majority willing to adopt this
task, but not everyone has determined their position, or made their
preferences known, yet.  Canon requires a wsdl extension (a policy assertion
in addition is acceptable), and in a timely manner.

 

We also broached the topic of Patent Policy implications of doing this work
in the XMLP WG or in the WSDL WG, which quickly scared everyone away ;-).

 

[1]
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-ws-desc/2006Oct/att-0074/20061026-ws
-desc-minutes.html#item10

 

 

Jonathan Marsh -  <http://www.wso2.com> http://www.wso2.com -
<http://auburnmarshes.spaces.live.com> http://auburnmarshes.spaces.live.com