- From: Jonathan Marsh <jmarsh@microsoft.com>
- Date: Sat, 29 Jan 2005 15:04:25 -0800
- To: "Philippe Le Hegaret" <plh@w3.org>, <www-ws-cg@w3.org>
I thought CGs were prohibited from adopting technical deliverables. > -----Original Message----- > From: www-ws-cg-request@w3.org [mailto:www-ws-cg-request@w3.org] On > Behalf Of Philippe Le Hegaret > Sent: Friday, January 28, 2005 8:19 AM > To: www-ws-cg@w3.org > Subject: Web Services Glossary > > In the ongoing discussion happening around Web Services Management, it > appears that there is a need to have glossary for Web Services. The > WSA > WG produced one [1] but it is no longer maintained. Also, some terms > don't appear in it or would need an update (new WSDL terms, client vs > agent, ...). > Since this glossary cannot be owned by a Working Group, it would make > sense for the Coordination Group to own it and coordinate its update > with the various Working Groups. The resulting document would then be > published as a Coordination Group note and be an ongoing project. I > believe this is something worth considering for the Coordination > Group, > > Regards, > > Philippe > > > [1] http://www.w3.org/TR/2004/NOTE-ws-gloss-20040211/
Received on Saturday, 29 January 2005 23:04:46 UTC