- From: Hugo Haas <hugo@w3.org>
- Date: Tue, 1 Feb 2005 12:29:42 +0100
- To: Jonathan Marsh <jmarsh@microsoft.com>
- Cc: Philippe Le Hegaret <plh@w3.org>, www-ws-cg@w3.org
Received on Tuesday, 1 February 2005 11:29:44 UTC
* Jonathan Marsh <jmarsh@microsoft.com> [2005-01-29 15:04-0800] > I thought CGs were prohibited from adopting technical deliverables. I don't see anything in the Process about that[1]. As a matter of fact, the Process talks about CG Notes[2]. It would be nice to have our terminology in sync, which would probably help clarify things like what's a node (WSDL node, SOAP node), etc. The current glossary is a good starting point, taking into consideration that certain things need to be revisited based on feedback of the groups, e.g. people's feelings about the term agent. Cheers, Hugo 1. http://www.w3.org/2004/02/Process-20040205/groups.html#GroupsCG 2. http://www.w3.org/2004/02/Process-20040205/tr.html#q74 -- Hugo Haas - W3C mailto:hugo@w3.org - http://www.w3.org/People/Hugo/
Received on Tuesday, 1 February 2005 11:29:44 UTC