- From: Mark Nottingham <mark.nottingham@bea.com>
- Date: Tue, 2 Nov 2004 13:57:02 -0500
- To: www-ws-cg@w3.org
On October 12th and 13th, the W3C held a Workshop on Constraints and Capabilities for Web Services[1]. Over 50 participants discussed the had a wide-ranging discussion, but generally agreed upon addressing a restricted set of today's issues in Web services (e.g., security, management, internationalisation) while allowing extensibility for the future. Of particular interest was the exact level of functionality -- from conjunction and disjunction, negation, through to arithmetic and relational operators -- provided by such a framework. Many existing solutions, such as WS-Policy, address conjunction and disjunction, leaving more advanced functionality to future extensions. Others, such as Rei, address more. Participants agreed that an immediate solution is preferable, but were more diverse in their opinions regarding the functionality needed in such a first cut. However, there was general agreement that basing work on an existing solution, rather than starting fresh, is more likely to produce successful results. Most participants agreed with the following recommendations: - a Working Group should start sooner rather than later - More than one Working Group may be needed to satisfy the diverse requirements in this area - the Working Group should focus on develop a framework for the constraints and capabilities. - Such a Working Group should focus on a framework for constraints and capabilities; specific vocabularies should be left to other specifications' developers. For example, internationalisation assertions should be left to an i18n WG. - Such a Working Group should, however, provide guidelines for the benefit of assertion authors. - The expression of constraints and capabilities shouldn't be restricted to any particular mechanism; e.g., SOAP Headers, WSDL, WS-CDL or UDDI, but should be usable in any such "attachment" mechanism. - having a starting point is a good idea There was less agreement between participants on the following points: - having a working group uniquely dedicated to develop use cases and requirements - the scope of working group in terms of the functionalities needed - the timeline - should the features and properties mechanism be used? The W3C will take these recommendations into account when considering future work in this area. 1. http://www.w3.org/2004/09/ws-cc-program.html Regards, Mark Nottingham and Philippe Le Hégaret, Chairs -- Mark Nottingham Principal Technologist Office of the CTO BEA Systems
Received on Tuesday, 2 November 2004 18:57:05 UTC