- From: Steve Bratt <steve@w3.org>
- Date: Mon, 23 Feb 2004 09:16:30 -0500
- To: ecobb@bea.com
- Cc: www-ws-cg@w3.org
To Ed Cobb, Chair of WS-I Liaison Committee (from BEA) ---- Hi Ed, This is in follow-up to our phone call of 2 December 2004. At that time, we agreed to consult within our organizations and compile a list of the key liaison objectives that might be better addressed under a more formal W3C/WS-I liaison arrangement, as compared to the current informal arrangement. Further, we agreed that if we could identify a sufficient number objectives, we would assign one person from each side to develop a draft a liaison MOU and charter [1]. Following consultation with our WS Coordination Group and Team, here is an initial list of objectives: 1. Work to support inclusion of W3C Recommendations in to WS-I profiles, e.g. have them use SOAP 1.2 instead of SOAP 1.1. 2. Improve coordination of public messaging on Web services matters. 3. Gain visibility into each others non-public documents and test suites. We are just completing an MOU with OMA that may help to overcome obstacles regarding differences in IPR and confidentiality policies between our organizations. Have you made progress on gathering the interests of WS-I in this regard? Let's arrange another call after you send your list, and as soon as possible. Best Regards, Steve [1] Liaison section of W3C process Document: http://www.w3.org/2004/02/Process-20040205/liaisons.html#Liaisons -- Steven R Bratt, Chief Operating Officer mailto:steve@w3.org World Wide Web Consortium http://www.w3.org MIT Computer Science and Artificial Intelligence Laboratory 200 Technology Square, Room NE43-352 Cambridge, MA 02139, USA / Voice: +1.617.253.7697 / Fax: +1.617.258.5999
Received on Monday, 23 February 2004 09:18:21 UTC