- From: Christopher B Ferris <chrisfer@us.ibm.com>
- Date: Mon, 22 Jul 2002 22:23:03 -0400
- To: "Krishna Sankar" <ksankar@cisco.com>
- Cc: "'Hugo Haas'" <hugo@w3.org>, www-ws-cg@w3.org, www-ws-cg-request@w3.org
I believe that the intent of this document is that it be a "registry" (of sorts) of normatively defined MEPs. They need not be defined in W3C specs necessarily, but they do need to be formally defined/specified (IMO). The Usage Scenarios doc [1] would be where I would expect to find a list of patterns (MEPs) required for Web services at a higher level of abstraction (e.g. not a formal specification). Cheers, Christopher Ferris Architect, Emerging e-business Industry Architecture email: chrisfer@us.ibm.com phone: +1 508 234 3624 [1] http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/arch/2/07/16-ws-arch-scenarios/ws-arch-scenarios.html "Krishna Sankar" <ksankar@cisco.co To: "'Hugo Haas'" <hugo@w3.org>, <www-ws-cg@w3.org> m> cc: Sent by: Subject: RE: Message exchange patterns document www-ws-cg-request @w3.org 07/22/2002 02:11 PM Hugo, Good. May I suggest that this document be the reference which contains THE collection of all MEPs required for web services (and SOAP message based) interactions ? Currently the "defined message exchange patterns" contain only the interactions defined in a W3C specification. A related question : Should we have a registration process for MEPs ? Then all specifications - W3C/OASIS et al - can uniformly and unambiguously refer to MEPs. cheers | -----Original Message----- | From: www-ws-cg-request@w3.org | [mailto:www-ws-cg-request@w3.org] On Behalf Of Hugo Haas | Sent: Monday, July 22, 2002 11:00 AM | To: www-ws-cg@w3.org | Subject: Message exchange patterns document | | | | As per my action item, I have started a document about message | exchange patterns whose goals are (from the abstract): | | * explain how to document a MEP. | * list the MEPs developed within the Web Services Activity. | * eliminate discrepancies. | | The document is available at: | http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/cg/2/07/meps.html Message exchange patterns have a role in SOAP, WSDL, and are likely to come to play in other places (e.g. conversation, choreography). I think that the XML Protocol Working Group and the Web Services Description Working Group should come in agreement about using a same concept and way to describe MEPs, and that the Web Services Architecture Working Group should look into generalizing MEPs. Regards, Hugo -- Hugo Haas - W3C mailto:hugo@w3.org - http://www.w3.org/People/Hugo/ - tel:+1-617-452-2092
Received on Monday, 22 July 2002 22:52:51 UTC