Re: Comments on the usage scenarios document

Hi Hao.

* Hugo Haas <hugo@w3.org> [2004-01-19 15:28+0100]
> - 3.15.4 Non-requirements:
> 
> |    1. Intermediaries. Justification: While intermediaries will be very
> |       important, a first version of security would be greatly successful
> |       without
> 
> I am not convinced about this. I thought that the OASIS WS secure
> messaging work did address intermediaries. It needs to be removed IMO.

As discussed, this is still present in "3.14.3.2 Non-requirements" and
should be removed.

[..]
> - 3.24 S090 Sending non-XML data:
> 
> We should probably mention here the MTOM work done by the XML Protocol Working
> Group. I am currently offline so I can't give you references, but they
> are on the XML Protocol WG page.

For 3.23.2 Description:

Small tweak:

 Support for non-XML data has been described elsewhere. The SOAP with
 Attachments [SwA] submission to the W3C has been adopted by the ebXML
 Message Services specification [ebXML MSS] as the basis for defining
 a message structure which can support non-XML data.

And then add at the end:

 <p>The <loc href="http://www.w3.org/2000/xp/Group/">XML Protocol Working
 Group</a> is working on the optimization of the transmission of SOAP
 messages, which includes the transmission of non-XML data along with
 a SOAP envelope: <loc href="http://www.w3.org/TR/soap12-mtom/">SOAP
 Message Transmission Optimization Mechanism</loc>.</p>

Regards,

Hugo

-- 
Hugo Haas - W3C
mailto:hugo@w3.org - http://www.w3.org/People/Hugo/