Re: Capabilities in the architecture

* Francis McCabe <fgm@fla.fujitsu.com> [2004-01-23 14:41-0800]
> I think that this sounds like a good idea.
> It may also tie in quite well with the notion of a service role

* Katia Sycara <katia@cs.cmu.edu> [2004-01-24 12:23-0500]
> Hugo, I like this. It ties in with the work that the semantic service
> discovery people are doing where a capability is the services
> "functionality". Saying it is a feature that an agent/service supports
> broadens this and allows to include what OWL-S has as "non-functional
> parameters" (e.g. service availability, qos features, security requirements
> etc) within the notion of capability.

Good. I've just committed it:

  http://dev.w3.org/cvsweb/~checkout~/2002/ws/arch/wsa/wd-wsa-arch-review2.html#capability

Regards,

Hugo

-- 
Hugo Haas - W3C
mailto:hugo@w3.org - http://www.w3.org/People/Hugo/