RE: Section 1.6 and REST - Can we make this more clear and useful ? from Champion, Mike on 2004-01-25 (www-ws-arch@w3.org from January 2004)

From: Champion, Mike <Mike.Champion@SoftwareAG-USA.com>
Date: Sun, 25 Jan 2004 13:56:59 -0500
To: www-ws-arch@w3.org
Cc: w3c-wsa-editors@w3.org
Message-ID: <BDD579D96530CA4BAAAD5D9549BDE779015CC6A1@resmsg01.sagus.com>

 

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Newcomer, Eric [mailto:Eric.Newcomer@iona.com] 
> Sent: Sunday, January 25, 2004 12:41 PM
> To: Champion, Mike; www-ws-arch@w3.org
> Subject: RE: Section 1.6 and REST - Can we make this more 
> clear and useful ?
> 

> One reason I brought up this issue is that on page 13 of the 
> current draft, section 1.6.3 it says there are two major 
> classes of Web services, one of them REST-compliant. 

Aha! I think that's an anachronism from before the ur-Troutpond was drained
at the July F2F.  I had an action item once to track those all down; I guess
I missed that one.

Received on Sunday, 25 January 2004 13:56:34 UTC