- From: Hugo Haas <hugo@w3.org>
- Date: Fri, 9 Jan 2004 13:06:20 +0100
- To: "Cutler, Roger (RogerCutler)" <RogerCutler@chevrontexaco.com>
- Cc: David Booth <dbooth@w3.org>, www-ws-arch@w3.org
Received on Friday, 9 January 2004 07:06:20 UTC
* Cutler, Roger (RogerCutler) <RogerCutler@chevrontexaco.com> [2004-01-08 14:54-0600] > Have you been following this thread, Hugo? It seems to me that the > changes you propose would move it significantly in the direction that > I'm uncomfortable with, for reasons I have tried to explain (near the > bottom of the long thread). You caught me. I must admit that I got lost in all the layers of quoting. > FWIW, I personally think that it is NOT a good idea to recommend URI's > for this purpose. So our opinions seem to differ here. But I am > certainly willing to consider that a more detailed look at the > mechanisms might prove me wrong -- which I think David was trying to > indicate by talking about the issues involving details of engineering. > > At any rate, I certainly don't want to get involved in a big conflict > about this. At the most I think we are talking about nuances, and I'm > not emotionally involved with my nuance. Same here. The clickable/dereferencable change I proposed isn't problematic, it seems. For the rest, I'm happy to stay with some text that you're comfortable with. Regards, Hugo -- Hugo Haas - W3C mailto:hugo@w3.org - http://www.w3.org/People/Hugo/
Received on Friday, 9 January 2004 07:06:20 UTC