Re: Issues to think about in the MOM

Thanks for clarifying, Ugo.

On Thu, Nov 20, 2003 at 12:17:23PM -0800, Ugo Corda wrote:
> Regarding the unclear cases 7 and 8:
> 
> 7. WSDL-based extensions
> 
> The way I understand this case (again, I was not the author of the original list) is a WSDL (non-standard) extension that would describe routing information not expressed at the WSDL message level itself. The submitter would just look at that information and exploit whatever out-of-band mechanism is available (at any level of the transmission stack) to realize the described routing. I don't have any specific example of this, and in fact I think it was raised as a (in principle possible) speculation. 

That sounds like it wouldn't be part of the message.

> 8. Using application-specific semantics
> 
> I think this is just the case where routing info is expressed at the level of the application payload (no SOAP feature/module involved).

So that would be in the message.

Mark.

Received on Thursday, 20 November 2003 15:26:55 UTC