Re: Separate concepts for "service" and "targetResource?" (was RE : /service/@targetResource ?)

On Wed, May 21, 2003 at 03:20:32PM -0400, Katia Sycara wrote:
> As for Mark Baker's concern about the resources that a service changes
> "behind" it, such as accounts that a bank transfer service may change, these
> resources are "private" to the service and do not have a URI anyway (as far
> as the external world of services is concerned).

If that's what other folks have in mind too, then I suggest that
the name of this attribute not include the word "resource".

MB
-- 
Mark Baker.   Ottawa, Ontario, CANADA.        http://www.markbaker.ca
Web architecture consulting, technical reports, evaluation & analysis
  Actively seeking contract work or employment

Received on Wednesday, 21 May 2003 16:26:17 UTC