- From: Mark Baker <distobj@acm.org>
- Date: Thu, 15 May 2003 14:29:53 -0400
- To: www-ws-arch@w3.org
[is anybody else not getting this thread in email, or is just me? I've checked my configuration thoroughly.] FWIW, I don't think there's much in that sentence for the WG to worry about (as much as I'd like it to be, since there's much more to be said). All it seems to be saying, as written, is that an operation needs to be described as safe or not, which is similar to previous discussions about the idempotency of an operation being indicated. A "safe" attribute could easily be added to wsdl:operation to address this. MB -- Mark Baker. Ottawa, Ontario, CANADA. http://www.markbaker.ca Web architecture consulting, technical reports, evaluation & analysis Actively seeking contract work or employment
Received on Thursday, 15 May 2003 14:27:26 UTC