- From: Geoff Arnold <Geoff.Arnold@Sun.COM>
- Date: Tue, 06 May 2003 01:39:46 -0400
- To: Mark Baker <distobj@acm.org>
- Cc: "Newcomer, Eric" <Eric.Newcomer@iona.com>, www-ws-arch@w3.org
On Tuesday, May 6, 2003, at 01:07 AM, Mark Baker wrote: > But "constraints" are constraints on relationships; > > "A software architecture is defined by a configuration of architectural > elements--components, connectors, and data--constrained in their > relationships in order to achieve a desired set of architectural > properties." > -- > http://www.ics.uci.edu/~fielding/pubs/dissertation/ > software_arch.htm#sec_1_2 > For the record, I'll just point out that this is a quite idiosyncratic definition of "software architecture", insofar as it does not support the critical notion of whether an implementation conforms to an architecture. Fortunately I'm not aware of any WSA work which relies upon it.... Geoff
Received on Tuesday, 6 May 2003 01:39:43 UTC