- From: Champion, Mike <Mike.Champion@SoftwareAG-USA.com>
- Date: Thu, 26 Jun 2003 14:10:26 -0400
- To: www-ws-arch@w3.org
> -----Original Message----- > From: Katia Sycara [mailto:katia@cs.cmu.edu] > Sent: Thursday, June 26, 2003 12:39 PM > To: 'Champion, Mike'; www-ws-arch@w3.org > Cc: katia@cs.cmu.edu > Subject: RE: Core concepts and relationships as an ontology? > > I can undertake to have the concepts and relationships in > rdf or daml. > However, I am currently and for much of the summer on travel, > so if this > task can wait till August, then I can do it. Hi Katia, I don't think there's a big rush ... unless you think that DAML-S would help us drain some of the trout ponds! I doubt it, since I think our disagreements are about more than just the logical implications of the concepts / relationships and more about fuzzier issues. >
Received on Thursday, 26 June 2003 14:10:35 UTC