- From: Martin Chapman <martin.chapman@oracle.com>
- Date: Fri, 6 Jun 2003 12:04:49 -0700
- To: "Jean-Jacques Moreau" <jean-jacques.moreau@crf.canon.fr>
- Cc: <www-ws-arch@w3.org>
so i based my model on the following text that starts section 2: "Soap provides a distributed processing model that assumes a soap message originates at an initial soap sender and is sent to an ulitmate soap receiver via zero or more soap intermediaries." Which clear lyimplies a singular unltimate receiver. However I agree with you and will change the diagram, but I think the text in soap needs some clarification!. Martin. > -----Original Message----- > From: www-ws-arch-request@w3.org [mailto:www-ws-arch-request@w3.org]On > Behalf Of Jean-Jacques Moreau > Sent: Friday, June 06, 2003 8:09 AM > To: Martin Chapman > Cc: www-ws-arch@w3.org > Subject: Re: SOAP UML diagram > > > > Looks good. One more comment, there may be more than one ultimate > receiver per message (ibid. for intermediaries). For example, when using > a multicast MEP. The spec has normally been written in a way which > supports this. > > JJ. > > Martin Chapman wrote: > > > > > I had an action point from the F2F to draw a uml diagram of > soap. Here's a > > first cut at the basics. I need to think about how features and > the binding > > framework fit in (if at all). > > > > > http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-archive/2003Jun/att-0009/S oap_Uml.pn > g > > Martin. > _________________________________________________________________ > Martin Chapman 500 Oracle Parkway > Consulting Member of Technical Staff Ms 4op990 > Oracle Redwood Shores, > P: +1 650 506 6941 CA 94065 > e: martin.chapman@oracle.com USA >
Received on Friday, 6 June 2003 15:04:49 UTC