- From: He, Hao <Hao.He@thomson.com.au>
- Date: Wed, 2 Jul 2003 14:47:06 +1000
- To: "'Champion, Mike'" <Mike.Champion@SoftwareAG-USA.com>, www-ws-arch@w3.org
Received on Wednesday, 2 July 2003 00:45:33 UTC
http://www.oreillynet.com/pub/wlg/3005 Did I just make myself unpopular by posting this link? Hao -----Original Message----- From: Champion, Mike [mailto:Mike.Champion@SoftwareAG-USA.com] Sent: Tuesday, July 01, 2003 6:16 PM To: www-ws-arch@w3.org Subject: Polls (was RE: Proposed text for 2.2.21 (take 2)) > -----Original Message----- > From: Francis McCabe [mailto:fgm@fla.fujitsu.com] > Sent: Monday, June 30, 2003 1:44 PM > To: Hao He > Cc: 'David Orchard'; 'Ugo Corda'; 'Anne Thomas Manes'; > www-ws-arch@w3.org > Subject: Re: Proposed text for 2.2.21 (take 2) > > > I think the group should vote on this. This is the same thing > that has been debated again and again; it is time to put it to bed. Vote on what? The text for the "message" concept that Hao is working on? Or the trout-pond-from-RESTifarian-hell "is a plain XML message without SOAP headers a Web service?" We have a new ability to create straw polls easily, so please propose some wording. (Any chronically festering issue is fine, and I'm asking the group not just Frank)
Received on Wednesday, 2 July 2003 00:45:33 UTC