- From: Anne Thomas Manes <anne@manes.net>
- Date: Wed, 15 Jan 2003 13:30:12 -0500
- To: "Ugo Corda" <UCorda@SeeBeyond.com>, "Www-Ws-Arch@W3. Org" <www-ws-arch@w3.org>
It's optional in SOAP 1.2, but I'm pretty sure it's going to stay. > -----Original Message----- > From: www-ws-arch-request@w3.org [mailto:www-ws-arch-request@w3.org]On > Behalf Of Ugo Corda > Sent: Wednesday, January 15, 2003 12:47 PM > To: Assaf Arkin; Anne Thomas Manes; www-ws-arch@w3.org > Subject: RE: programming model for document-style SOAP > > > > > > RPC encoding may looked like a good idea at the time, but I > think we all know > > how to achieve the same results using XML Schema, so I'm hoping > it will go > > away before WSDL 1.2 becomes a recommendation. > > SOAP encoding has already been dropped from WS-I Basic Profile > 1.0. If it is true that WS-I will be very influential on how > actual implementations work, SOAP encoding will practically > disappear from the marketplace, regardless of whether SOAP 1.2 > removes it or not (but I wish that SOAP 1.2 also drops it). > > Ugo >
Received on Wednesday, 15 January 2003 13:29:29 UTC