RE: Can anyone point us to information on WS-Reliability from Hao He on 2003-01-10 (www-ws-arch@w3.org from January 2003)

From: Hao He <Hao.He@thomson.com.au>
Date: Fri, 10 Jan 2003 15:31:09 +1100
To: "'Assaf Arkin'" <arkin@intalio.com>, Jeff Mischkinsky <jeff.mischkinsky@oracle.com>, "Champion, Mike" <Mike.Champion@softwareag-usa.com>, www-ws-arch@w3.org
Message-ID: <686B9E7C8AA57A45AE8DDCC5A81596AB046AE249@sydthqems01.INT.TISA.COM.AU>

Just one comment on one part.

3.2.4 No clear why you would want an asynch ack if you are using a
synchronous protocol, or how you could get synch ack when using an
asynchronous protocol. From an implementation perspective, when would I want
to use this operation?

<hh>From our implementation experience, a synch ack always helps when you
are using an asynchronous protocol.  It simplify greatly on coordinating
between the client and the server. </hh>

Hao

Attachments

text/plain attachment: InterScan_Disclaimer.txt

Received on Thursday, 9 January 2003 23:30:15 UTC