RE: Myth of loose coupling

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Jean-Jacques Dubray [mailto:jjd@eigner.com]
> Sent: Wednesday, January 08, 2003 10:11 AM
> To: 'Champion, Mike'; www-ws-arch@w3.org
> Subject: RE: Myth of loose coupling
> 
 
> It would certainly help to elevate the debate at the 
> metamodel level and
> establish a mapping to technological concepts such as GET, 
> URI and POST.
> A picture being worth more than a thousand words on this list, I would
> suggest to illustrate it with UML class diagrams.

That sounds like a good way forward!  Sure, anyone want to propose some
pictures?  And don't even THINK about starting a tangential thread on the
value of UML :-)  Don't like UML, draw some other picture using whatever
discipline you want.

Received on Wednesday, 8 January 2003 10:16:23 UTC