Re: Business Preotocol (was: Application Protocol Definition) from bhaugen on 2003-02-27 (www-ws-arch@w3.org from February 2003)

From: bhaugen <linkage@interaccess.com>
Date: Thu, 27 Feb 2003 16:32:48 -0600
To: James M Snell <jasnell@us.ibm.com>
Cc: www-ws-arch@w3.org
Message-id: <006001c2deb0$28bbc580$b8eafea9@PC1>

James M Snell wrote:
> The term "business protocols" as I've been using it would encompass
the
> broad family of technology-independent business protocols available.
> RosettaNet PIP 3A4, ebXML BPSS would all fall under this category so
we're
> not usurping anything.

Sorry about the word "usurp", sounded like an accusation.
If you use the same word
for the technology-independent business protocol
and also the technical implementations,
won't that be confusing?

Received on Thursday, 27 February 2003 17:33:45 UTC