- From: David Orchard <dorchard@bea.com>
- Date: Wed, 26 Feb 2003 20:59:41 -0800
- To: "'Mike Champion'" <mike.champion@softwareag-usa.com>, <www-ws-arch@w3.org>
Not sure what kind of pointer you are looking for. It seems like a fairly straightforward, though controversial, position. I could argue that this is part of the "keep web services simple" position. Cheers, Dave > -----Original Message----- > From: www-ws-arch-request@w3.org [mailto:www-ws-arch-request@w3.org]On > Behalf Of Mike Champion > Sent: Wednesday, February 26, 2003 7:19 PM > To: www-ws-arch@w3.org > Subject: XML.com whitepaper on XML, SOAP and Binary Data > > > > [AFAIK this is not directly related to anything on the WG's > high-priority > list, but touches on several topics of interest to us. Dave > Orchard (or > any of the authors who read this list), would you like to point us to > anything in particular?] > > 'Authors Adam Bosworth, BEA Systems > Don Box, Microsoft > Martin Gudgin, Microsoft > Mark Nottingham, BEA Systems > David Orchard, BEA Systems > Jeffrey Schlimmer, Microsoft > > Copyright Notice > © 2003 BEA Systems, Microsoft Corporation. All rights > reserved. Abstract > This white paper discusses the architectural issues > encountered when using > opaque non-XML data in XML applications, including (but not > limited to) Web > services and SOAP. > Status > This white paper is provided as-is and for review and > evaluation only. > Microsoft and BEA hope to solicit your contributions and > suggestions in the > near future. BEA and Microsoft make no warrantees or representations > regarding this document in any manner whatsoever. > Table of Contents > 1. Introduction > 2. Current Approaches to Opaque Data in XML > 2.1 Embedding > 2.2 Referencing > 3. When Worlds Collide > 4. Flexibility in Representation, Consistency in Model > 5. Conclusions > 6. Acknowledgements > 7. References' > > http://www.xml.com/pub/a/2003/02/26/binaryxml.html > -- > Mike Champion > >
Received on Thursday, 27 February 2003 00:02:42 UTC