- From: David Orchard <dorchard@bea.com>
- Date: Wed, 26 Feb 2003 10:14:37 -0800
- To: "'Mark Baker'" <distobj@acm.org>
- Cc: <www-ws-arch@w3.org>
Imagine that an intermediary that has to deal with multiple protocols. So it has to be configured with understanding multi-protocols. In the same way there are "HTTP Routers" that understand 1 protocol, "SOAP Routers" understand many protocols that SOAP is layered upon. Cheers, Dave > -----Original Message----- > From: Mark Baker [mailto:distobj@acm.org] > Sent: Tuesday, February 25, 2003 9:50 PM > To: David Orchard > Cc: www-ws-arch@w3.org > Subject: Re: Visibility (was Re: Introducing the Service Oriented > Architec tural style, and it's constraints and properties. > > > On Tue, Feb 25, 2003 at 10:41:05AM -0800, David Orchard wrote: > > Visibility may or may not be improved. For single > protocols, visibility is > > improved with use of GET, PUT, DELETE - not POST as Chris > Ferris explained. > > But for multi-protocol, visibility may be improved by other means. > > I'm sorry, but I don't understand what that means. > > What do you mean by single vs. multi protocols? > > MB > -- > Mark Baker. Ottawa, Ontario, CANADA. http://www.markbaker.ca > Web architecture consulting, technical reports, evaluation & analysis >
Received on Wednesday, 26 February 2003 15:24:01 UTC