Re: Transport-specific SOAP semantics - was Re: Visibility

On Wed, Feb 26, 2003 at 10:17:40AM -0500, jones@research.att.com wrote:
> 
> +1
> 
> I have been in the XMLP WG from the beginning.  Protocol independence
> has always been the presumption.

To be clear about my position, and my work on SOAP 1.2, I've repeatedly
said that SOAP should be protocol independant.  But that's a different
thing than saying that all SOAP messages should mean the same thing
independant of underlying protocol.

MB
-- 
Mark Baker.   Ottawa, Ontario, CANADA.        http://www.markbaker.ca
Web architecture consulting, technical reports, evaluation & analysis

Received on Wednesday, 26 February 2003 11:07:05 UTC