- From: Bill de hÓra <bill.dehora@propylon.com>
- Date: Wed, 19 Feb 2003 09:19:13 +0000
- To: James M Snell <jasnell@us.ibm.com>
- CC: "Burdett, David" <david.burdett@commerceone.com>, Assaf Arkin <arkin@intalio.com>, David Orchard <dorchard@bea.com>, Michael Mealling <michael@verisignlabs.com>, "'Cutler, Roger \"\"(RogerCutler)'" <RogerCutler@ChevronTexaco.com>, www-ws-arch@w3.org, www-ws-arch-request@w3.org
James M Snell wrote: > The *act* of flipping the switch is *not* a resource. The *protocol* that > defines how to flip the switch *is* a resource. I this one just goes round and round. If you wanted to name such an act (say in an ontology or for a logic) and did so using a URI, then its a resource. Mark Baker points out that maybe naming that action doesn't buy you much, but it could buy someone something (say in an ontology or for a logic), so i ddi see any reason to disallow the possibility. Bill de hÓra
Received on Wednesday, 19 February 2003 04:22:09 UTC