- From: Mark Baker <distobj@acm.org>
- Date: Tue, 18 Feb 2003 17:30:40 -0500
- To: David Orchard <dorchard@bea.com>
- Cc: "'Cutler, Roger (RogerCutler)'" <RogerCutler@chevrontexaco.com>, www-ws-arch@w3.org
Dave, On Tue, Feb 18, 2003 at 12:59:09PM -0800, David Orchard wrote: > 1. The W3C TAG should darned well write up what a resource is from a web > architecture perspective. Doesn't this count? "A resource is defined by [RFC2396] to be anything that has identity." -- http://www.w3.org/TR/webarch/#identification Or did you want something more specific than a punt to 2396? Personally, I'm quite happy with the punt. > 2. The WS-Arch group ought to relate a service to a resource *somehow* I'd suggest that; "All Web services have identity, and are therefore resources." is as far as we can go with that, at least until the definition of what a Web service is, is figured out. The current one is still very fuzzy, IMO. MB -- Mark Baker. Ottawa, Ontario, CANADA. http://www.markbaker.ca Web architecture consulting, technical reports, evaluation & analysis
Received on Tuesday, 18 February 2003 17:27:56 UTC