- From: <Daniel_Austin@grainger.com>
- Date: Wed, 5 Feb 2003 10:21:27 -0600
- To: hugo@w3.org
- Cc: Daniel_Austin@grainger.com, www-ws-arch@w3.org, www-ws-arch-request@w3.org
Excellent, I will link to this definition in my response.
"Hugo Haas"
<hugo@w3.org> To: Daniel_Austin@grainger.com
Sent by: cc: www-ws-arch@w3.org
www-ws-arch-reque Subject: Re: [ISSUES] Issue #10 - proposed resolution
st@w3.org
02/05/2003 05:42
AM
[ Reducing the recipients list. ]
* Daniel_Austin@grainger.com <Daniel_Austin@grainger.com> [2003-02-03
16:02-0600]
> Also, in regard to your comment on non-repudiation; the Working
Group
> does not intend to require particular algorithms for non-repudiation, but
> we agree that a definition of the term should occur in the WS Glossary
> document.
As a matter of fact, it already does:
http://www.w3.org/TR/2002/WD-ws-gloss-20021114/#nonrepudiation
Regards,
Hugo
--
Hugo Haas - W3C
mailto:hugo@w3.org - http://www.w3.org/People/Hugo/
Received on Wednesday, 5 February 2003 11:21:17 UTC