- From: <Daniel_Austin@grainger.com>
- Date: Wed, 5 Feb 2003 10:21:27 -0600
- To: hugo@w3.org
- Cc: Daniel_Austin@grainger.com, www-ws-arch@w3.org, www-ws-arch-request@w3.org
Excellent, I will link to this definition in my response. "Hugo Haas" <hugo@w3.org> To: Daniel_Austin@grainger.com Sent by: cc: www-ws-arch@w3.org www-ws-arch-reque Subject: Re: [ISSUES] Issue #10 - proposed resolution st@w3.org 02/05/2003 05:42 AM [ Reducing the recipients list. ] * Daniel_Austin@grainger.com <Daniel_Austin@grainger.com> [2003-02-03 16:02-0600] > Also, in regard to your comment on non-repudiation; the Working Group > does not intend to require particular algorithms for non-repudiation, but > we agree that a definition of the term should occur in the WS Glossary > document. As a matter of fact, it already does: http://www.w3.org/TR/2002/WD-ws-gloss-20021114/#nonrepudiation Regards, Hugo -- Hugo Haas - W3C mailto:hugo@w3.org - http://www.w3.org/People/Hugo/
Received on Wednesday, 5 February 2003 11:21:17 UTC