- From: Paul Denning <pauld@mitre.org>
- Date: Fri, 05 Dec 2003 17:51:09 -0500
- To: www-ws-arch@w3.org
fyi, RFC 3234 Middleboxes: Taxonomy and Issues http://www.ietf.org/rfc/rfc3234.txt Intermediaries in the web services architecture probably could include some things that would be in RFC 3234, and some other things not in RFC 3234. There is also an IETF Middlebox Comm WG http://www.ietf.org/html.charters/midcom-charter.html These are related works. I think WSA needs to get crisper language about SOAP intermediaries as they relate to service descriptions. We either need to tell WSDWG that they MUST address R031 [1] "The WG specification(s) SHOULD support SOAP 1.2 intermediaries." or tell WSCG that this is a gap that needs filling (i.e., how to describe SOAP intermediaries). If we have a way to describe SOAP intermediaries, then WS-Chor may be able to address how they fit into a choreography. [1] http://www.w3.org/TR/ws-desc-reqs/#binddesc Paul
Received on Friday, 5 December 2003 17:51:33 UTC