- From: Geoff Arnold <Geoff.Arnold@Sun.COM>
- Date: Tue, 12 Aug 2003 12:56:02 -0400
- To: Ugo Corda <UCorda@SeeBeyond.com>
- Cc: "Cutler, Roger (RogerCutler)" <RogerCutler@ChevronTexaco.com>, www-ws-arch@w3.org
>> You're talking about the implementation of the agent, not the >> properties of the MEP. >> > > True, but it's also true that usually people think of 2 as > asynchronous. That implies that people usually focus on the agent > behavior when talking about sync/async. I agree with Roger that saying > that 2 is synchronous would confuse a lot of people. > I absolutely agree that "saying 2 is synchronous" would confuse a lot of people. Fortunately we shouldn't ever be in the position of "saying 2", because we are implementation-neutral. Aren't we?
Received on Tuesday, 12 August 2003 12:55:19 UTC