- From: Geoff Arnold <Geoff.Arnold@Sun.COM>
- Date: Mon, 11 Aug 2003 18:09:51 -0400
- To: Anne Thomas Manes <anne@manes.net>
- Cc: www-ws-arch@w3.org
On Monday, August 11, 2003, at 05:45 PM, Anne Thomas Manes wrote: > The way I see it, the service URI *names* the service (effectively > equivalent to the wsdl:service @name). It is not and should not be > construed > to be an endpoint of the service. +1 .... but in the case where the service and its endpoint(s) are described by an HTTP-accessible WSDL document, is there anything we want to say about the [?non]relationship between the URI for the WSDL and the URI which *names* the service? Just curious..... Geoff
Received on Monday, 11 August 2003 18:42:08 UTC