RE: new editor's draft of WSA available

Hao,

While you may be right, for this draft I think that this would a) require 
some
substantial rework and b) we would need to gain consensus from the WG.

I'd suggest that you bring this issue up at the f2f.

Cheers,

Christopher Ferris
Architect, Emerging e-business Industry Architecture
email: chrisfer@us.ibm.com
phone: +1 508 234 3624

www-ws-arch-request@w3.org wrote on 10/25/2002 01:56:31 AM:

> First, I'd like to thank the editors for the good work and including the
> harvesting stuff we did some time ago.  It makes me that the work was
> worthwhile (maybe).
> 
> Second, I want to ask the group's opinion on SOAP messaging. I want to 
say
> that in many cases, SOAP messaging is not necessary at all.  People are 
just
> happy to get XML from a URL without any SOAP packaging.  This is 
actually
> fine for many use cases (especially for query type of services).  I hope
> that messaging without SOAP can also become part of the document.
> 
> Hao
> [attachment "InterScan_Disclaimer.txt" deleted by Christopher B 
Ferris/Waltham/IBM]