- From: Champion, Mike <Mike.Champion@SoftwareAG-USA.com>
- Date: Tue, 29 Oct 2002 15:58:23 -0700
- To: www-ws-arch@w3.org
> -----Original Message----- > From: David Orchard [mailto:dorchard@bea.com] > Sent: Tuesday, October 29, 2002 4:19 PM > To: 'Mike Champion'; www-ws-arch@w3.org > Subject: RE: WSA assumes SOAP? > > > I'm really torn on this one. Likewise! > Maybe they are "best practices"? > Or a "level 1" web service? I like "Level 1" web service. They are perfectly legitimate, and good for some subset of use cases (Paul Prescod might argue that this doesn't need to be a proper subset!). Still, ya gotta pay the SOAP tax if you want WS-Security ... ya gotta pay the WSDL tax if you want choreography, etc. etc. etc. It's analogous to well-formed XML ... perfectly legal, but you gotta pay the DTD/schema tax if you want constraints, defaults, validation, data binding, types, etc. etc. etc.
Received on Tuesday, 29 October 2002 18:38:04 UTC