- From: Hugo Haas <hugo@w3.org>
- Date: Fri, 25 Oct 2002 16:51:45 +0200
- To: www-ws-arch@w3.org
* Mark Baker <distobj@acm.org> [2002-10-25 10:11-0400] > I like some aspects of the second one, but the show stopper for me is > that it says "are described using XML", rather than "are capable of being > defined [...] in XML". The latter includes the existing Web, while the > former does not. I recommend that we don't get back to this debate now, and use the same, agreed upon (at least for now), definition in all of our drafts, i.e. update the architecture document with the definition from the requirements. Regards, Hugo -- Hugo Haas - W3C mailto:hugo@w3.org - http://www.w3.org/People/Hugo/
Received on Friday, 25 October 2002 10:52:18 UTC