- From: Hao He <Hao.He@thomson.com.au>
- Date: Wed, 23 Oct 2002 10:06:37 +1000
- To: "'Assaf Arkin'" <arkin@intalio.com>, Ugo Corda <UCorda@SeeBeyond.com>
- Cc: www-ws-arch@w3.org
- Message-ID: <686B9E7C8AA57A45AE8DDCC5A81596AB046AE0EC@sydthqems01.INT.TISA.COM.AU>
IMO, Asynchronous: A sends a message to B, B does not return the result during the interaction. Instead, A needs to pick up the expected result later (however long that may be) from a location pre-arranged by A and B. The arrangement may be done during the interaction, for example, by a receipt. Synchronous: A sends a message to B, B returns the result at the end of the interaction. Hao -----Original Message----- From: Assaf Arkin [mailto:arkin@intalio.com] Sent: Wednesday, October 23, 2002 9:20 AM To: Ugo Corda Cc: www-ws-arch@w3.org Subject: How to determine if an operation is synchronous Let's assume two nodes, A and B, that exchange a message through some protocol(s) of unknown latency L. Asynchronous: A sends a message M1 at time T1, B receives the message M1 at time T2. T2 = T1+L. Since neither A nor B know what L is, A cannot determine when B received the message, nor can B determine when A sent the message. (The message may contain a time stamp equal to T1, but it's possible that A's clock is off compared to B's clock, and so the time reading is not reliable) Synchronous: A sends a message M1 at time T1, B receives the message M1 at time T2. Again T2 = T1+L. B processes the message, the processing time P is unknown as well. B sends back the message M2 at time T3. T3 = T2+P = T1+L+P. A receives the message M2 at time T4. T4 = T3+L = T1+2*L+P. Since A and B do not know L, A cannot determine when B received M1 or sent M2, nor can B determine when A send M1 or received M2. A knows that its operation occurred around the time instant Ta. Ta is calculated from the mean time of the operation. Ta = (T1+T4)/2. B knows that its operation occurred around the time instant Tb. Tb is calculated from the mean time of the operation. Tb = (T2+T3)/2. Ta = (T1+T4)/2 = (T1+T1+2*L+P)/2 = T1+L+P/2 =(T1+L+T1+L+P)/2 = (T2+T3)/2 = Tb So, whatever L and P are, both operations occur at the same time instant. We say that A and B are synchronized. Now, if A included a time stamp in the message M1 (T1), and B included two time stamps in the message M2 (T2, T3), then A could synchronize it's clock against B. A can't just use the values T2 or T3, because A's clock can be off compared to B's. But A knows that it's operation occurred at Ta (it's clock), and knows that Ta=Tb+offset, and knows that Tb=(T2+T3)/2 (T2,T3 given from B's clock), so it knows the offset is Ta-(T2+T3)/2. A can now synchronize it's clock with B's. arkin I still don't see how a WSDL Input-Output Operation description tells me anything about the synchronous/asynchronous nature of the interaction. Ugo -----Original Message----- From: Assaf Arkin [mailto:arkin@intalio.com] Sent: Tuesday, October 22, 2002 10:53 AM To: Ugo Corda Cc: www-ws-arch@w3.org Subject: RE: Definition of Choreography I am not assuming that the protocol is synchronous. I perfectly accept the case that the request-response operation will occur over an asynchronous protocol. If you are using an asynchronous protocol, then you can perform two interactions: 1) Service X can start both interactions one after the other, but not expect one interaction to end before the second one begins. In this case, service X can receive the response of the second interaction before the response of the first interaction. 2) Service X can start the second interaction after it receives the response to the first interaction, in which case it knows that the first operation has completed before the second one starts. However, if service X performs the interactions in the second manner, if can deduct the order in which operations are performed by service Y. That means that if service X orders the interactions to occur sequentially, waiting for one to complete (response received) before beginning the second one, it observes a synchronous pattern. You can also deduct that by performing two asynchronous operations, e.g. service X performs one-way interaction followed by notification interaction. In this case, you use to asynchronous operations to compose a synchronous pattern. To be more precise, the synchronous nature of the operation from the perspective of the service is a matter of whether the operation involves two-way message exchange, or one-way message exchange. The synchronous nature of the operation from the perspective of the protocol (e.g. SOAP), is a matter of whether the operation is composed into a single two-way communication, or performed over two one-way communications. Two asynchronous communications (message exchange at wire level) can be used to create a synchronous operation (interaction at service level). To add even more confusion, a synchronous communication (message exchange at wire level) can be used to create an asynchronous operation (interaction at service level). arkin
Attachments
- text/plain attachment: InterScan_Disclaimer.txt
Received on Tuesday, 22 October 2002 20:07:42 UTC