- From: Paul Prescod <paul@prescod.net>
- Date: Mon, 21 Oct 2002 14:10:36 -0700
- To: www-ws-arch@w3.org
David Orchard wrote: > Paul, > > I think you are missing the point of the "global models" out there. Given > messages between nodes A, B and C, sometimes A wants to know about messages > to C, and sometimes it doesn't. Please give a concrete use case. As per your direction, the travel agent example is most appropriate. > ... And it > does work exactly "like that". Customers and users of processes often (but > again, not always) want visibility into the nested choreographies. I think that this is _always_ a mistake to expose the implementation of functions to customers as part of the interface. I had thought that there was a unanimous consensus on this issue in the software world. Nevertheless, if you wish to expose your implementation, you can do it with a simple hyperlink from the public interface to your code or business process specification. paul Prescod
Received on Monday, 21 October 2002 17:11:14 UTC