W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-ws-arch@w3.org > October 2002

RE: Definition of Choreography

From: Mathews, Walden <walden.mathews@tfn.com>
Date: Sun, 20 Oct 2002 08:02:03 -0400
Message-ID: <1373D6342FA1D4119A5100E029437F64045EEE1E@clifford.devo.ilx.com>
To: "'Sandeep Kumar '" <sandkuma@cisco.com>, "Mathews, Walden" <walden.mathews@tfn.com>, "''Champion, Mike ' '" <Mike.Champion@SoftwareAG-USA.com>, "'www-ws-arch@w3.org '" <www-ws-arch@w3.org>


>-----Original Message-----
>From: Sandeep Kumar
>To: Mathews, Walden; 'Champion, Mike '; www-ws-arch@w3.org
>Sent: 10/19/2002 9:00 PM
>Subject: RE: Definition of Choreography

>Would like to see Exceptions paths as well modeled in the state machine
>proposed below. IMHO, abnormal & alternate execution paths,
>and defining compensating behaviors
>on those is the critical part of any system.
>Sandeep Kumar

That would be a bad idea, for the reason that a bunch of people
have been squawking about on this list.  It would unnecessarily
constrain implementation designs, and make the model large and
complex.  That's if I understand you correctly.

If you're talking about events which sometimes trigger state change
and sometimes do not, that's what guard conditions express.

Received on Sunday, 20 October 2002 08:02:11 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 23:05:41 UTC