RE: Spec draft

Ugo,
 
Good comments, thanks.  I've seen the +1s too about the first comment and actually I agree about both changes.  I'll fix the text,
 
Eric

-----Original Message-----
From: Ugo Corda [mailto:UCorda@SeeBeyond.com]
Sent: Thursday, October 03, 2002 10:40 PM
To: Newcomer, Eric; www-ws-arch@w3.org
Subject: RE: Spec draft


Eric,
 
The document looks good to me so far. I have just a couple of comments.
 
- second block of text just below Figure 2, 
"The request/response pattern is also often called the remote procedure call (RPC) oriented interaction style"
 
It might often be called that way, but I don't think it's a good idea to reinforce that belief here. The interaction style, RPC or document, should be completely orthogonal to the request/response pattern, so that, for instance, I can have a request/response pattern that uses the document style instead of RPC.
 
- just before "Extended Web Services Architecture", 
"The interaction can be single message one way, broadcast from requester to many services, a multi message conversation, or a business process."
 
Is this an exhaustive list? Probably not. In that case it's better to rephrase it with something like "Examples of interactions are ...".
 
 
Ugo