W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-ws-arch@w3.org > October 2002

Re: Label for Top Node of "triangle diagram"

From: Francis McCabe <fgm@fla.fujitsu.com>
Date: Tue, 1 Oct 2002 09:14:39 -0700
Cc: www-ws-arch@w3.org
To: Doug Bunting <db134722@iplanet.com>
Message-Id: <E2A18C1A-D558-11D6-A684-000393A3327C@fla.fujitsu.com>
This is a resend of a diagram I sent out earlier.

It is different kind of diagram to the triangle as it doesn't focus on 
the players in the game so much. However,  see my previous comments ;->

On Monday, September 30, 2002, at 04:00  PM, Doug Bunting wrote:

> Frank,
> My apologies that nobody has chosen to follow up with you in public.
> I'd like to request that you resend the particular diagram you 
> mention.  If it's the layering diagram from your presentation at the 
> f2f, I'd add the additional great value it provided of putting 
> everything we do with regards to web services at the OSI application 
> layer.  That context is very important whether or not we still believe 
> OSI got its 7 layers correct.
> It seems likely the triangle diagram (as it has grown and been shaped) 
> will remain in our architecture document.  An overall contextual 
> diagram such as you showed could suitably set the stage for it.
> Francis McCabe wrote:
> ...
> The bottom line? On reflection, the diagram seems to cause more
> confusion than light. A while ago I sent out a diagram based on layers;
> I am not sure that that is the right thing to do here but it's merit is
> that it clearly  distinguishes the different kinds of activities and
> entities involved in interacting systems.
> Frank
> thanx,
>     doug
Received on Tuesday, 1 October 2002 12:15:01 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 23:05:41 UTC