Thursday, 31 October 2002
- RE: WSA assumes SOAP?
- RE: Choreography: Narrowing Down the Requirements
- RE: Choreography: Narrowing Down the Requirements
- proposed Choreography charter - Halloween Draft
- RE: Choreography: Narrowing Down the Requirements
- RE: Choreography: Narrowing Down the Requirements
- Choreography: Narrowing Down the Requirements
- Re: Stop the ... -> Usage Cases
Wednesday, 30 October 2002
- RE: Stop the ... -> Usage Cases
- RE: Comments on Draft WSA
- RE: Stop the ... -> Usage Cases
- [MTF] service lifecycle diagrams
- RE: SOAP AF review comment 1 response
- Re: SOAP AF review comment 3 response
- Re: SOAP AF review comment 1 response
- SOAP AF review comment 1 response
- RE: Stop the ... -> Usage Cases
- SOAP AF review comment 3 response
- Re: Harvesting choreography diagram
- RE: Potential issue around ws-security and wsdl definitions
- RE: Stop the ... -> Usage Cases
- RE: Stop the ... -> Usage Cases
- RE: Stop the ... -> Usage Cases
- Re: new editor's draft of WSA available
- Fw: Comments on Draft WSA
- RE: new editor's draft of WSA available
Friday, 25 October 2002
Wednesday, 30 October 2002
- RE: Stop the ... -> Usage Cases
- RE: Stop the ... -> Usage Cases
- RE: new editor's draft of WSA available
- RE: new editor's draft of WSA available
- RE: Stop the ... -> Usage Cases
Tuesday, 29 October 2002
Monday, 28 October 2002
Friday, 25 October 2002
Sunday, 27 October 2002
Friday, 25 October 2002
- Messaging without SOAP? (was RE: new editor's draft of WSA availa ble)
- RE: eCommerce Choreography Use Case
Thursday, 24 October 2002
Friday, 25 October 2002
- Test email
- RE: eCommerce Choreography Use Case
- RE: Potential issue around ws-security and wsdl definitions
Monday, 28 October 2002
- RE: Long owed Description stack words
- Re: Long owed Description stack words
- RE: Long owed Description stack words
Tuesday, 29 October 2002
- Test Posting - Ignore
- RE: WSA assumes SOAP?
- Generic Usage Scenario
- RE: Harvesting choreography diagram
- Re: Harvesting choreography diagram
- [MTF] Call Agenda
- Re: New editors' copy of the Web Services Architecture Glossary available
Monday, 28 October 2002
- Re: New editors' copy of the Web Services Architecture Glossary a vailable
- RE: New editors' copy of the Web Services Architecture Glossary a vailable
- RE: New editors' copy of the Web Services Architecture Glossary a vailable
- Re: New editors' copy of the Web Services Architecture Glossary available
- Re: New editors' copy of the Web Services Architecture Glossary available
- Re: New editors' copy of the Web Services Architecture Glossary available
- Re: new editor's draft of WSA available
- Re: new editor's draft of WSA available
- Re: new editor's draft of WSA available
- Re: Long owed Description stack words
- Re: new editor's draft of WSA available
- Re: new editor's draft of WSA available
- Re: Long owed Description stack words
- Re: Long owed Description stack words
- Re: Long owed Description stack words
- Re: Long owed Description stack words
Sunday, 27 October 2002
Friday, 25 October 2002
- Re: Long owed Description stack words
- Long owed Description stack words
- RE: Contention Management in the WSA
- Harvesting choreography diagram
- Re: Definition of a Web service out of sync (was Re: New editors' copy of the Web Services Architecture Glossary available)
- RE: Contention Management in the WSA
- Contention Management in the WSA
- WSA assumes SOAP?
- Re: Definition of a Web service out of sync (was Re: New editors' copy of the Web Services Architecture Glossary available)
- Re: new editor's draft of WSA available
- Re: new editor's draft of WSA available
- Re: Definition of a Web service out of sync (was Re: New editors' copy of the Web Services Architecture Glossary available)
- SOAs
- Re: Definition of a Web service out of sync (was Re: New editors' copy of the Web Services Architecture Glossary available)
- RE: eCommerce Choreography Use Case
- Re: new editor's draft of WSA available
- Definition of a Web service out of sync (was Re: New editors' copy of the Web Services Architecture Glossary available)
- Re: new editor's draft of WSA available
- Re: new editor's draft of WSA available
- Re: new editor's draft of WSA available
- Re: new editor's draft of WSA available
- Re: new editor's draft of WSA available
- Re: New editors' copy of the Web Services Architecture Glossary available
- Re: new editor's draft of WSA available
- RE: new editor's draft of WSA available
- RE: eCommerce Choreography Use Case
Thursday, 24 October 2002
- RE: eCommerce Choreography Use Case
- RE: Potential issue around ws-security and wsdl definitions
- Re: new editor's draft of WSA available
- RE: eCommerce Choreography Use Case
- New editors' copy of the Web Services Architecture Glossary available
- Re: new editor's draft of WSA available
- Re: new editor's draft of WSA available
- Regrets for 10/24 conference calls
- RE: new editor's draft of WSA available
- RE: WS-I Basic Profile Working Group Draft published
- Re: new editor's draft of WSA available
- Re: new editor's draft of WSA available
- eCommerce Choreography Use Case
Wednesday, 23 October 2002
- RE: new editor's draft of WSA available
- RE: new editor's draft of WSA available
- Re: How to determine if an operation is synchronous
- RE: new editor's draft of WSA available
- RE: How to determine if an operation is synchronous
- RE: new editor's draft of WSA available
- RE: How to determine if an operation is synchronous
- RE: How to determine if an operation is synchronous
- RE: How to determine if an operation is synchronous
- RE: How to determine if an operation is synchronous
- RE: new editor's draft of WSA available
- RE: How to determine if an operation is synchronous
Tuesday, 22 October 2002
- How to determine if an operation is synchronous
- RE: new editor's draft of WSA available
- RE: new editor's draft of WSA available
- [MTF] Minutes of 10/22 meeting
- Regrets for Oct 24
- Re: new editor's draft of WSA available
- Re: Line between interface and implementation
- RE: Definition of Choreography
- RE: Definition of Choreography
- Use cases creeping into implementation
- RE: Definition of Choreography
- RE: Definition of Choreography
- RE: Definition of Choreography
- RE: Line between interface and implementation
- RE: Definition of Choreography
- RE: Definition of Choreography
- Line between interface and implementation
- RE: Definition of Choreography
- RE: Stop the Choreography Definition insanity!
- Re: Black box processes? (WAS: Definition of Choreography)
- Re: Automating the restaurant example
- RE: Definition of Choreography
Monday, 21 October 2002
- RE: Stop the Choreography Definition insanity!
- RE: Automating the restaurant example
- RE: Stop the Choreography Definition insanity!
- Re: Definition of Choreography
- Re: Stop the Choreography Definition insanity!
- RE: Definition of Choreography
- RE: Stop the Choreography Definition insanity!
- RE: Definition of Choreography
- RE: Definition of Choreography
- RE: Definition of Choreography
- RE: Definition of Choreography
- RE: choreography usage scenarios
- Automating the restaurant example
- RE: Explicit Ordering, was RE: Definition of Choreography
- Stop the Choreography Definition insanity!
- Explicit Ordering, was RE: Definition of Choreography
- RE: Definition of Choreography
- RE: choreography usage scenarios
- choreography usage scenarios
- RE: Definition of Choreography
- RE: Definition of Choreography
- RE: Definition of Choreography
- Re: Definition of Choreography
- Re: Definition of Choreography
- RE: Definition of Choreography
- new editor's draft of WSA available
- RE: Definition of Choreography
- Black box processes? (WAS: Definition of Choreography)
- Re: Artifacts in Requesters -- Simple Conventions for Diagrams
- RE: Definition of Choreography
- RE: Definition of Choreography
- Re: Definition of Choreography
- Re: Definition of Choreography
- RE: Definition of Choreography
- Re: Definition of Choreography
- RE: Definition of Choreography
- RE: Definition of Choreography
- RE: Definition of Choreography
- RE: Definition of Choreography
- Additions to usage scenario
- RE: Definition of Choreography
- RE: Definition of Choreography
- RE: Definition of Choreography
- RE: Definition of Choreography
- RE: Definition of Choreography
- RE: Definition of Choreography
- RE: Definition of Choreography
- RE: Definition of Choreography
Sunday, 20 October 2002
- Re: Definition of Choreography
- RE: Definition of Choreography
- RE: Definition of Choreography
- RE: Definition of Choreography
- Re: Definition of Choreography
- RE: Definition of Choreography
- Re: Definition of Choreography
- RE: Definition of Choreography
- RE: Definition of Choreography
- RE: Definition of Choreography
- RE: Definition of Choreography
- RE: Definition of Choreography
- RE: Definition of Choreography
- RE: Definition of Choreography
- RE: Definition of Choreography
- Re: Definition of Choreography
- RE: Definition of Choreography
- Re: Definition of Choreography
Saturday, 19 October 2002
- RE: Definition of Choreography
- RE: Definition of Choreography
- RE: Definition of Choreography
- Re: Definition of Choreography
- Re: Definition of Choreography
- RE: Definition of Choreography
- Scope of Choroegraphy Standardization (was RE: Definition of Chor eography)
- RE: Definition of Choreography
- RE: Definition of Choreography
- RE: remembering business data and taxonomy in description
- RE: remembering business data and taxonomy in description
- RE: Definition of Choreography
- RE: Definition of Choreography
- RE: remembering business data and taxonomy in description
- Re: Definition of Choreography
- RE: remembering business data and taxonomy in description
- Re: Definition of Choreography
- Re: Definition of Choreography
- Re: Definition of Choreography
- RE: Definition of Choreography
- RE: Definition of Choreography
Friday, 18 October 2002
- RE: Definition of Choreography
- RE: Definition of Choreography
- RE: Definition of Choreography
- RE: Definition of Choreography
- RE: Definition of Choreography
- RE: Definition of Choreography
- Re: Definition of Choreography
- RE: Definition of Choreography
- Re: Definition of Choreography
- RE: Definition of Choreography
- RE: Definition of Choreography
- RE: Definition of Choreography
- RE: Definition of Choreography
- SOAP 1.2 Attachment Feature review by the Web Services Architecture Working Group
- Re: Gateways
- Re: Definition of Choreography
- RE: Definition of Choreography
- RE: Definition of Choreography
- Re: Definition of Choreography
- Swizzle words (more on SOAP 1.2 Attachment Feature)
Thursday, 17 October 2002
- RE: [MTF] New draft of WSMA with updated Pictures
- RE: Choreography Declarative/Procedural Spectrum
- Choreography and asynchronous messaging
- Choreography Declarative/Procedural Spectrum
- RE: Definition of Choreography
- Re: IRC
- IRC
- RE: Definition of Choreography
- RE: Definition of Choreography
- RE: Definition of Choreography
- RE: Definition of Choreography
- I'll be a little late for today's meeting </eom>
- Re: RoyF's work on Architecture Meta models
- RoyF's work on Architecture Meta models
- RE: Definition of Choreography
- FYI: WS-I Basic Profile Working Group Draft published
- Re: [MTF] New draft of WSMA with updated Pictures
- Re: SOAP 1.2 Attachment Feature review
- Re: Definition of Choreography
- RE: Definition of Choreography
- RE: Definition of Choreography
- RE: Definition of Choreography
Wednesday, 16 October 2002
- Definition of Choreography
- Re: Potential issue around ws-security and wsdl definitions
- Re: SOAP 1.2 Attachment Feature review
- [MTF] New draft of WSMA with updated Pictures
- RE: Potential issue around ws-security and wsdl definitions
- regrets for Oct 24
- Artifacts in Requesters
- Re: SOAP 1.2 Attachment Feature review
- Potential issue around ws-security and wsdl definitions
- RE: Gateways
- [MTF] Management terms definition
- Re: Gateways
Tuesday, 15 October 2002
- RE: remembering business data and taxonomy in description
- RE: SOAP 1.2 Attachment Feature review
- Re: remembering business data and taxonomy in description
- RE: remembering business data and taxonomy in description
- RE: remembering business data and taxonomy in description
- RE: remembering business data and taxonomy in description
- RE: remembering business data and taxonomy in description
- RE: remembering business data and taxonomy in description
- RE: Gateways
- Re: remembering business data and taxonomy in description
- FW: Request for WD publication of Web Services Architecture Requi reme nts
- Re: Gateways
- RE: Gateways
- Re: Gateways
Monday, 14 October 2002
Sunday, 13 October 2002
Friday, 11 October 2002
- remembering business data and taxonomy in description
- RE: naming roles in WSA
- RE: Artifacts
- Re: Gateways
- RE: what is discovery - One concrete proposal
- Re: WSDL, RDF and REST
- FW: Fitting "Choreography" into the WSA framework
- RE: what is discovery - One concrete proposal
- RE: what is discovery - One concrete proposal
- RE: what is discovery - One concrete proposal
- RE: Spec draft
- RE: Artifacts
- RE: what is discovery - One concrete proposal
- RE: Spec draft
- Re: SOAP 1.2 Attachment Feature review
- Re: SOAP 1.2 Attachment Feature review
- Re: what is discovery - One concrete proposal
- Re: what is discovery - One concrete proposal
- Re: Artifacts
- Re: Gateways
- Re: Spec draft
- Re: what is discovery - One concrete proposal
Sunday, 13 October 2002
Friday, 11 October 2002
Thursday, 10 October 2002
- RE: naming roles in WSA
- Re: what is discovery - One concrete proposal
- Re: what is discovery - One concrete proposal
- RE: what is discovery - One concrete proposal
- Re: what is discovery - One concrete proposal
- 20021011 version of Requirements document uploaded
- Re: what is discovery - One concrete proposal
- Regrets for Oct 10 call...
- Re: what is discovery - One concrete proposal
- Re: what is discovery - One concrete proposal
Wednesday, 9 October 2002
- Regrets for the 10/10 call
- Re: what is discovery - One concrete proposal
- RE: what is discovery - One concrete proposal
- RE: regrets for 10/10 and 10/17 due to travel --katia
- RE: what is discovery - One concrete proposal
- Re: Gateways
- RE: what is discovery - One concrete proposal
- what is discovery - One concrete proposal
- [Content removed. Inadvertantly sent via BugBear virus.]
- Re: Gateways
- Re: Gateways
- Re: Gateways
Tuesday, 8 October 2002
- RE: Un-fogging the Top cloud in triangle/rectangle diagram
- RE: Un-fogging the Top cloud in triangle/rectangle diagram
- Re: Un-fogging the Top cloud in triangle/rectangle diagram
- RE: Gateways
- RE: Gateways
- RE: Gateways
- Re: Gateways
- RE: Gateways
- RE: Top cloud in triangle/rectangle diagram
- Re: Gateways
- RE: Gateways
- RE: Gateways
- RE: Gateways
- RE: Gateways
- Re: Gateways
- RE: Gateways
- Event notification with the uniform interface constraint
- Re: Gateways
- RE: Gateways
- RE: Top cloud in triangle/rectangle diagram
- Un-fogging the Top cloud in triangle/rectangle diagram
- Gateways
- RE: Spec draft
- RE: Top cloud in triangle/rectangle diagram
- RE: Article on WS architecture and best practice ... may be of i n terest
- RE: Top cloud in triangle/rectangle diagram
- RE: Top cloud in triangle/rectangle diagram
- Re: Spec draft
- RE: Top cloud in triangle/rectangle diagram
- RE: Article on WS architecture and best practice ... may be of in terest
- RE: Top cloud in triangle/rectangle diagram
- Re: Article on WS architecture and best practice ... may be of in terest
- RE: Top cloud in triangle/rectangle diagram
- Re: Top cloud in triangle/rectangle diagram
Monday, 7 October 2002
- RE: Top cloud in triangle/rectangle diagram
- Re: Article on WS architecture and best practice ... may be of in terest
- RE: Top cloud in triangle/rectangle diagram
- RE: Top cloud in triangle/rectangle diagram
- RE: Spec draft - daveh comments
- RE: Article on WS architecture and best practice ... may be of in terest
- RE: Spec draft - daveh comments
- RE: Top cloud in triangle/rectangle diagram
- RE: Top cloud in triangle/rectangle diagram
- RE: Top cloud in triangle/rectangle diagram
- RE: Spec draft
- RE: Spec draft
- RE: Top cloud in triangle/rectangle diagram
- Re: wire stack words and diagram
- Re: Web Service Object Support
Sunday, 6 October 2002
- Latest, greatest version...was Re: new WSA Requirements document uploaded
- Re: Web Service Object Support
Saturday, 5 October 2002
- RE: Web Service Object Support
- Web Service Object Support
- new WSA Requirements document uploaded
- RE: Spec draft
- RE: Top cloud in triangle/rectangle diagram
Friday, 4 October 2002
- RE: Spec draft & EXTENDED architecture
- RE: Spec draft
- RE: Top cloud in triangle/rectangle diagram
- WWW2003 Call for Papers
- RE: Top cloud in triangle/rectangle diagram
- Re: Label for Top Node of "triangle diagram"
- RE: Spec draft
- RE: Top cloud in triangle/rectangle diagram
- RE: Spec draft
- Fwd: Top cloud in triangle/rectangle diagram
- Top cloud in triangle/rectangle diagram
- Re: Spec draft
- RE: Spec draft
- RE: Spec draft
- RE: Spec draft
- Re: Spec draft
- Re: Spec draft
- RE: Article on WS architecture and best practice ... may be of in terest
- RE: Spec draft
Thursday, 3 October 2002
- RE: Current summary of Label for Top Node of "triangle diagram"
- Joke: http://www.webservile.com/
- Couple of relevant papers FWIW
- Re: Article on WS architecture and best practice ... may be of in terest
- RE: Spec draft
- RE: Article on WS architecture and best practice ... may be of in terest
- RE: wire stack words and diagram
- Article on WS architecture and best practice ... may be of intere st
- RE: Current summary of Label for Top Node of "triangle diagram"
- Re: Current summary of Label for Top Node of "triangle diagram"
- Re: wire stack words and diagram
- RE: Spec draft
- Re: wire stack words and diagram
- Re: wire stack words and diagram
- Re: Current summary of Label for Top Node of "triangle diagram"
- Spec draft
- RE: Words for the Triangles - why I resist "publishing"
- RE: Label for Top Node of "triangle diagram"
- RE: Label for Top Node of "triangle diagram"
- Re: Current summary of Label for Top Node of "triangle diagram"
Wednesday, 2 October 2002
- RE: Label for Top Node of "triangle diagram"
- Re: Words for the Triangles
- RE: Current summary of Label for Top Node of "triangle diagram"
- RE: Current summary of Label for Top Node of "triangle diagram"
- Re: Current summary of Label for Top Node of "triangle diagram"
- RE: Current summary of Label for Top Node of "triangle diagram"
- Re: Label for Top Node of "triangle diagram"
- RE: Completeness
- Current summary of Label for Top Node of "triangle diagram"
- RE: Label for Top Node of "triangle diagram"
- RE: Label for Top Node of "triangle diagram"
- RE: Words for the Triangles
- Re: Label for Top Node of "triangle diagram"
- RE: Label for Top Node of "triangle diagram"
- Re: SOAP 1.2 Attachment Feature review
- SOAP 1.2 Attachment Feature review
Tuesday, 1 October 2002
- Re: Label for Top Node of "triangle diagram"
- RE: Label for Top Node of "triangle diagram"
- RE: Label for Top Node of "triangle diagram"
- RE: Label for Top Node of "triangle diagram"
- Re: Label for Top Node of "triangle diagram"
- Re: Words for the Triangles
- Re: Label for Top Node of "triangle diagram"
- Re: Words for the Triangles
- Re: Words for the Triangles
- RE: Label for Top Node of "triangle diagram"
- RE: wire stack words and diagram
- Re: Label for Top Node of "triangle diagram"
- Re: wire stack words and diagram
- RE: wire stack words and diagram
- Grokking the Web
- Re: SOAP 1.2 types of intermediaries
- Re: wire stack words and diagram
- Re: wire stack words and diagram